GOP vs NUDG
Subversive Congressional Republicans Trading ETF vs Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF
Which is better, GOP or NUDG?
GOP has been ahead.
NUDG has a lower expense ratio. GOP led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GOP | NUDG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.73% | 0.61%Best |
| AUM | $86M | $5.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.59% | 0.48% |
| Holdings | 272 | 43 |
| YTD Return | +15.28%Best | +5.01% |
| 1Y Return | +15.59% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.08% | - |
| Fund Family | Subversive Capital | Nuveen |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 7, 2023 | Jun 2, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
GOP vs NUDG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GOP vs NUDG Performance
Subversive Congressional Republicans Trading ETF (GOP) is an ETF from Subversive Capital and Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF (NUDG) is an ETF from Nuveen. Year to date, GOP is up 15.28% versus a gain of 5.01% for NUDG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GOP charges 0.73% per year while NUDG charges 0.61%. On a $10,000 position that is $73 vs $61 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GOP currently yields 0.59% against 0.48% for NUDG.
Holdings Overlap
At least 12.7% of GOP's money is in holdings NUDG also owns.
Stated as a floor: for NUDG, our book for it covers 94.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
GOP and NUDG share little of their money.
16 positions in common, counted across the 134 positions we hold weights for in GOP and 41 in NUDG, against full books of 272 and 43.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GOP | Weight in NUDG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 0.59% | 7.58% | 6.99% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 4.27% | 3.38% | 0.89% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 0.61% | 6.53% | 5.92% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.86% | 4.72% | 3.86% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 1.93% | 1.62% | 0.31% |
| LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares | 0.59% | 2.34% | 1.75% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 0.88% | 2.01% | 1.13% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 0.51% | 2.34% | 1.83% |
| NEENextera Energy Inc | 0.44% | 2.20% | 1.76% |
| ELVElevance Health Inc | 0.51% | 2.11% | 1.60% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GOP and NUDG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GOP or NUDG?
GOP has an expense ratio of 0.73% while NUDG charges 0.61%. NUDG is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between GOP and NUDG?
At least 12.7% of GOP's money is in holdings NUDG also owns. Our book for NUDG is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 134 positions we hold weights for in GOP and 41 in NUDG.
Which pays a higher dividend, GOP or NUDG?
GOP yields 0.59% while NUDG yields 0.48%, so GOP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NUDG better than GOP?
NUDG has a lower expense ratio. GOP led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.