GOP vs VOO
Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. GOP delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GOP | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.73% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $87M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.56% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 138 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +23.08% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +29.61% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.43% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.5% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Subversive Capital | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 7, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
GOP vs VOO Performance
Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF (GOP) is a ETF from Subversive Capital and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GOP returned +29.61% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, GOP is up 23.08% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, GOP compounded at +21.43% per year against +21.80% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, GOP has the edge at +18.71% annualized vs +13.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.2% compared with 13.5% for GOP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.7% for GOP and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GOP charges 0.73% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $73 vs $3 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GOP currently yields 0.56% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
GOP and VOO share 89 holdings out of 556 unique holdings combined, representing a 25.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GOP or VOO?
GOP has an expense ratio of 0.73% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $70 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GOP or VOO?
Over the past year GOP returned +29.61% vs +22.02% for VOO, so GOP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), GOP annualized +18.71% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GOP or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.2% annualized versus 13.5% for GOP. Worst drawdown: GOP -20.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both GOP and VOO?
GOP and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GOP and VOO?
GOP and VOO share 89 common holdings with a 25.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 556 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GOP or VOO?
GOP yields 0.56% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.