GPIQ vs IVV
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GPIQ or IVV?
GPIQ has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GPIQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GPIQ | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $5.6B | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 9.94% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 109 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +14.80%Best | +12.01% |
| 1Y Return | +20.12%Best | +16.48% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.07%Best | +21.21% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.3% | 12.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -21.1% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $19,578Best | $19,176 |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.7% | 37.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 24, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 26, 2023 to Sep 14, 2026 (2.9 years).
GPIQ vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
GPIQ vs IVV Performance
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GPIQ returned +20.12% while IVV returned +16.48%. Year to date, GPIQ is up 14.80% versus a gain of 12.01% for IVV.
Over three years, GPIQ compounded at +26.07% per year against +21.21% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GPIQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.3% compared with 12.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.1% for GPIQ and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GPIQ charges 0.29% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GPIQ currently yields 9.94% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
94.6% of GPIQ's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 54.0% of IVV's money is in holdings GPIQ also owns.
Most of GPIQ is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
87 positions in common, counted across the 103 positions we hold weights for in GPIQ and 490 in IVV, against full books of 109 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 395 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for GPIQ (44.6% of the fund), and 10 for GPIQ that do not appear in IVV (3.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GPIQ | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.56% | 8.07% | 0.49% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.72% | 7.02% | 0.70% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.88% | 5.69% | 0.19% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.51% | 3.84% | 0.67% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.75% | 3.00% | 0.75% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.67% | 1.63% | 3.04% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.95% | 2.65% | 0.30% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.78% | 1.90% | 0.88% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.46% | 1.16% | 2.30% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.22% | 2.39% | 0.17% |
94.6% of GPIQ is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GPIQ or IVV?
GPIQ has an expense ratio of 0.29% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GPIQ or IVV?
Over the past year GPIQ returned +20.12% vs +16.48% for IVV, so GPIQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GPIQ or IVV?
GPIQ has been the more volatile fund at 14.3% annualized versus 12.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GPIQ -21.1% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both GPIQ and IVV?
GPIQ and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GPIQ and IVV?
94.6% of GPIQ's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 54.0% of IVV's is in holdings GPIQ also owns. They hold 87 positions in common, counted across the 103 positions we hold weights for in GPIQ and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, GPIQ or IVV?
GPIQ yields 9.94% while IVV yields 1.06%, so GPIQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than GPIQ?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GPIQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.