GPTY vs IVV
YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GPTY or IVV?
GPTY has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GPTY led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GPTY | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.06% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $132M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 38.49% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 94 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +25.41%Best | +11.57% |
| 1Y Return | +31.91%Best | +17.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.71% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.80% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.7% | 13.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -26.6% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $14,697Best | $12,604 |
| Top 10 Weight | 51.0% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 22, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 23, 2025 to Sep 10, 2026 (1.6 years).
GPTY vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
GPTY vs IVV Performance
YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GPTY returned +31.91% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, GPTY is up 25.41% versus a gain of 11.57% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GPTY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.7% compared with 13.0% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.6% for GPTY and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GPTY charges 1.06% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $106 vs $3 annually, a gap of $103 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GPTY currently yields 38.49% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
74.5% of GPTY's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 38.2% of IVV's money is in holdings GPTY also owns.
Most of GPTY is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
18 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in GPTY and 505 in IVV, against full books of 94 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 477 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for GPTY (61.2% of the fund), and 6 for GPTY that do not appear in IVV (16.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GPTY | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 6.79% | 7.98% | 1.19% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.56% | 6.86% | 2.30% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 4.94% | 5.44% | 0.50% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 5.47% | 3.19% | 2.28% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.35% | 4.01% | 0.34% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.89% | 2.98% | 0.91% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 5.33% | 0.55% | 4.78% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 3.89% | 1.94% | 1.95% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. | 4.20% | 1.18% | 3.02% |
| IBMInternational Business Machines Corp. | 4.55% | 0.33% | 4.22% |
74.5% of GPTY is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GPTY or IVV?
GPTY has an expense ratio of 1.06% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $103 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GPTY or IVV?
Over the past year GPTY returned +31.91% vs +17.57% for IVV, so GPTY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GPTY annualized +27.21% vs +15.56% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GPTY or IVV?
GPTY has been the more volatile fund at 30.7% annualized versus 13.0% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GPTY -26.6% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both GPTY and IVV?
GPTY and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GPTY and IVV?
74.5% of GPTY's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 38.2% of IVV's is in holdings GPTY also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in GPTY and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, GPTY or IVV?
GPTY yields 38.49% while IVV yields 1.06%, so GPTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than GPTY?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GPTY led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.