GQQQ vs VTI
Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, GQQQ or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GQQQ led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GQQQ | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $174M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.46% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 104 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +22.84%Best | +14.27% |
| 1Y Return | +25.01%Best | +16.92% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.74% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.48% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.0% | 12.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.2% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $14,855Best | $13,874 |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.2% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Astoria Portfolio Advisors | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 1, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 1, 2024 to Oct 7, 2026 (2 years).
GQQQ vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
GQQQ vs VTI Performance
Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) is an ETF from Astoria Portfolio Advisors and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GQQQ returned +25.01% while VTI returned +16.92%. Year to date, GQQQ is up 22.84% versus a gain of 14.27% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GQQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 12.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.2% for GQQQ and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GQQQ charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GQQQ currently yields 0.46% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
98.9% of GQQQ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 53.7% of VTI's money is in holdings GQQQ also owns.
Most of GQQQ is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
100 positions in common, counted across the 103 positions we hold weights for in GQQQ and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 104 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,052 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for GQQQ (43.9% of the fund), and 2 for GQQQ that do not appear in VTI (0.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GQQQ | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.37% | 6.40% | 1.97% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.96% | 6.29% | 1.67% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.57% | 4.79% | 0.78% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.16% | 3.65% | 0.51% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.43% | 2.90% | 0.53% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.23% | 2.56% | 0.67% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.80% | 1.29% | 2.51% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.52% | 2.31% | 0.21% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.59% | 1.70% | 0.89% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.60% | 1.08% | 1.52% |
98.9% of GQQQ is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GQQQ or VTI?
GQQQ has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GQQQ or VTI?
Over the past year GQQQ returned +25.01% vs +16.92% for VTI, so GQQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GQQQ annualized +21.88% vs +17.79% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GQQQ or VTI?
GQQQ has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 12.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GQQQ -22.2% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both GQQQ and VTI?
GQQQ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GQQQ and VTI?
98.9% of GQQQ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 53.7% of VTI's is in holdings GQQQ also owns. They hold 100 positions in common, counted across the 103 positions we hold weights for in GQQQ and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, GQQQ or VTI?
GQQQ yields 0.46% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than GQQQ?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GQQQ led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.