GQQQ vs VTI
Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GQQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GQQQ | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $164M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.47% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 104 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +18.41% | +13.12% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.95% | +20.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.84% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Astoria Portfolio Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 1, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
GQQQ vs VTI Performance
Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) is a ETF from Astoria Portfolio Advisors and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GQQQ returned +27.95% while VTI returned +20.82%. Year to date, GQQQ is up 18.41% versus a gain of 13.12% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GQQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.2% for GQQQ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GQQQ charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GQQQ currently yields 0.47% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GQQQ and VTI share 97 holdings out of 2793 unique holdings combined, representing a 52.0% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GQQQ or VTI?
GQQQ has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GQQQ or VTI?
Over the past year GQQQ returned +27.95% vs +20.82% for VTI, so GQQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GQQQ annualized +21.02% vs +8.08% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GQQQ or VTI?
GQQQ has been the more volatile fund at 17.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GQQQ -22.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GQQQ and VTI?
GQQQ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between GQQQ and VTI?
GQQQ and VTI share 97 common holdings with a 52.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2793 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GQQQ or VTI?
GQQQ yields 0.47% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.