GQQQ vs IVV
Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GQQQ or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GQQQ led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GQQQ | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $164M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.46% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 104 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +18.48%Best | +12.51% |
| 1Y Return | +24.01%Best | +17.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.4% | 12.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.2% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $14,252Best | $13,636 |
| Top 10 Weight | 43.5% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Astoria Portfolio Advisors | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 1, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 11, 2026 (1.9 years).
GQQQ vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
GQQQ vs IVV Performance
Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) is an ETF from Astoria Portfolio Advisors and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GQQQ returned +24.01% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, GQQQ is up 18.48% versus a gain of 12.51% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GQQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 12.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.2% for GQQQ and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GQQQ charges 0.35% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GQQQ currently yields 0.46% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
90.6% of GQQQ's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 60.6% of IVV's money is in holdings GQQQ also owns.
Most of GQQQ is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
80 positions in common, counted across the 103 positions we hold weights for in GQQQ and 505 in IVV, against full books of 104 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 415 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for GQQQ (38.8% of the fund), and 20 for GQQQ that do not appear in IVV (8.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GQQQ | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 8.38% | 7.98% | 0.40% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.66% | 6.86% | 0.80% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 5.69% | 5.44% | 0.25% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.19% | 4.01% | 0.18% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 3.47% | 3.19% | 0.28% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.28% | 2.98% | 0.30% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.70% | 1.51% | 2.19% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.53% | 2.56% | 0.03% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 2.22% | 1.94% | 0.28% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. | 2.41% | 1.18% | 1.23% |
90.6% of GQQQ is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GQQQ or IVV?
GQQQ has an expense ratio of 0.35% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GQQQ or IVV?
Over the past year GQQQ returned +24.01% vs +17.57% for IVV, so GQQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GQQQ annualized +20.50% vs +17.73% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GQQQ or IVV?
GQQQ has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 12.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GQQQ -22.2% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both GQQQ and IVV?
GQQQ and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GQQQ and IVV?
90.6% of GQQQ's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 60.6% of IVV's is in holdings GQQQ also owns. They hold 80 positions in common, counted across the 103 positions we hold weights for in GQQQ and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, GQQQ or IVV?
GQQQ yields 0.46% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than GQQQ?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GQQQ led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.