GQQQ vs IVV
Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GQQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GQQQ | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $164M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.47% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 104 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +18.59% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +29.49% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.2% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Astoria Portfolio Advisors | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 1, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
GQQQ vs IVV Performance
Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) is a ETF from Astoria Portfolio Advisors and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GQQQ returned +29.49% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, GQQQ is up 18.59% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GQQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.2% for GQQQ and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GQQQ charges 0.35% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GQQQ currently yields 0.47% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
GQQQ and IVV share 78 holdings out of 530 unique holdings combined, representing a 58.1% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GQQQ or IVV?
GQQQ has an expense ratio of 0.35% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GQQQ or IVV?
Over the past year GQQQ returned +29.49% vs +21.89% for IVV, so GQQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GQQQ annualized +21.25% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GQQQ or IVV?
GQQQ has been the more volatile fund at 17.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GQQQ -22.2% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GQQQ and IVV?
GQQQ and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between GQQQ and IVV?
GQQQ and IVV share 78 common holdings with a 58.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 530 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GQQQ or IVV?
GQQQ yields 0.47% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.