GQQQ vs VYM
Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GQQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GQQQ | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $164M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.47% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 104 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +18.59% | +15.34% | |
| 1Y Return | +29.49% | +23.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.22% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.7% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.2% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Astoria Portfolio Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 1, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
GQQQ vs VYM Performance
Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) is a ETF from Astoria Portfolio Advisors and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GQQQ returned +29.49% while VYM returned +23.24%. Year to date, GQQQ is up 18.59% versus a gain of 15.34% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GQQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.7% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.2% for GQQQ and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GQQQ charges 0.35% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $4 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GQQQ currently yields 0.47% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
GQQQ and VYM share 31 holdings out of 675 unique holdings combined, representing a 18.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GQQQ or VYM?
GQQQ has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GQQQ or VYM?
Over the past year GQQQ returned +29.49% vs +23.24% for VYM, so GQQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GQQQ annualized +21.25% vs +7.04% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GQQQ or VYM?
GQQQ has been the more volatile fund at 17.7% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GQQQ -22.2% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both GQQQ and VYM?
GQQQ and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GQQQ and VYM?
GQQQ and VYM share 31 common holdings with a 18.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 675 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GQQQ or VYM?
GQQQ yields 0.47% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.