GQQQ vs VYM
Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, GQQQ or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GQQQ led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GQQQ | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $164M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.46% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 104 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +18.48%Best | +13.91% |
| 1Y Return | +24.01%Best | +17.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.12% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.17% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.4% | 10.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.2% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $14,252Best | $13,243 |
| Top 10 Weight | 43.5% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Astoria Portfolio Advisors | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 1, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 11, 2026 (1.9 years).
GQQQ vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
GQQQ vs VYM Performance
Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) is an ETF from Astoria Portfolio Advisors and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GQQQ returned +24.01% while VYM returned +17.57%. Year to date, GQQQ is up 18.48% versus a gain of 13.91% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GQQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 10.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.2% for GQQQ and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GQQQ charges 0.35% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $4 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GQQQ currently yields 0.46% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
21.2% of GQQQ's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 30.5% of VYM's money is in holdings GQQQ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 62 days apart, GQQQ as of Aug 31, 2026 and VYM as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
31 positions in common, counted across the 103 positions we hold weights for in GQQQ and 603 in VYM, against full books of 104 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 537 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for GQQQ (67.0% of the fund), and 69 for GQQQ that do not appear in VYM (77.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GQQQ | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.28% | 7.29% | 4.01% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 1.32% | 3.38% | 2.06% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.00% | 2.36% | 1.36% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.31% | 1.93% | 0.62% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 0.84% | 2.01% | 1.17% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 0.81% | 1.31% | 0.50% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 0.85% | 1.17% | 0.32% |
| GILDGilead Sciences Inc | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.39% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 0.87% | 0.75% | 0.12% |
| TXNTexas Instruments, Inc | 0.49% | 1.13% | 0.64% |
30.5% of VYM is already inside GQQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GQQQ or VYM?
GQQQ has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GQQQ or VYM?
Over the past year GQQQ returned +24.01% vs +17.57% for VYM, so GQQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GQQQ annualized +20.50% vs +15.93% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GQQQ or VYM?
GQQQ has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 10.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GQQQ -22.2% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both GQQQ and VYM?
GQQQ and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GQQQ and VYM?
30.5% of VYM's money is in holdings GQQQ also owns. 30.5% of VYM's is in holdings GQQQ also owns. They hold 31 positions in common, counted across the 103 positions we hold weights for in GQQQ and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, GQQQ or VYM?
GQQQ yields 0.46% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than GQQQ?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GQQQ led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.