GSEW vs VTI
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight US Large Cap Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, GSEW or VTI?
Nearly the same fund. VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GSEW led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GSEW | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2.2B | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.38% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 997 | 3,542 |
| YTD Return | +15.01%Best | +12.23% |
| 1Y Return | +16.28%Best | +12.74% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.48% | +21.44%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.98% | +10.83%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.0% | 16.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -38.6% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,680 | $16,722Best |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 12, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 14, 2017 to Nov 11, 2026 (9.2 years).
GSEW vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.2 years both funds cover.
GSEW vs VTI Performance
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight US Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GSEW returned +16.28% while VTI returned +12.74%. Year to date, GSEW is up 15.01% versus a gain of 12.23% for VTI.
Over three years, GSEW compounded at +19.48% per year against +21.44% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.98% and +10.83% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.43% annualized vs +11.79%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GSEW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 16.5% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.6% for GSEW and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GSEW charges 0.09% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $3 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GSEW currently yields 1.38% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 85.0% of VTI's money is in holdings GSEW also owns.
Stated as a floor: for GSEW, our book for it covers 94.5% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of VTI is already inside GSEW. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
459 positions in common, counted across the 470 positions we hold weights for in GSEW and 3,464 in VTI, against full books of 997 and 3,542.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GSEW | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 0.18% | 7.13% | 6.95% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 0.20% | 6.63% | 6.43% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 0.20% | 5.19% | 4.99% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 0.20% | 3.30% | 3.10% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 0.20% | 2.76% | 2.56% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.18% | 2.28% | 2.10% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 0.20% | 2.18% | 1.98% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 0.17% | 1.64% | 1.47% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co | 0.21% | 1.34% | 1.13% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 0.19% | 1.36% | 1.17% |
85.0% of VTI is already inside GSEW.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GSEW or VTI?
GSEW has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GSEW or VTI?
Over the past year GSEW returned +16.28% vs +12.74% for VTI, so GSEW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), GSEW annualized +11.79% vs +12.43% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GSEW or VTI?
GSEW has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 16.5% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GSEW -38.6% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both GSEW and VTI?
GSEW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GSEW and VTI?
At least 85.0% of VTI's money is in holdings GSEW also owns. Our book for GSEW is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 459 positions in common, counted across the 470 positions we hold weights for in GSEW and 3,464 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, GSEW or VTI?
GSEW yields 1.38% while VTI yields 1.06%, so GSEW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than GSEW?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GSEW led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.