GSGO vs VOO

GSGO vs VOO

Which is better, GSGO or VOO?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.8%.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns (1Y): VOOLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGSGOVOO
Expense Ratio0.45%0.03%Best
AUM$176M$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.08%
Holdings56509
YTD Return+10.54%+12.74%Best
1Y Return-+19.43%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.18%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.76%
Top 10 Weight49.8%36.4%Best
Fund FamilyGoldman Sachs Asset ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMay 24, 1999Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

GSGO vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

GSGO vs VOO Performance

Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF (GSGO) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, GSGO is up 10.54% versus a gain of 12.74% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GSGO charges 0.45% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GSGO currently yields 0.00% against 1.08% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

GSGO already in VOO86.1%
VOO already in GSGO48.4%

86.1% of GSGO's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 48.4% of VOO's money is in holdings GSGO also owns.

Most of GSGO is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

41 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in GSGO and 504 in VOO, against full books of 56 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 453 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for GSGO (50.9% of the fund), and 7 for GSGO that do not appear in VOO (6.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in GSGOWeight in VOODifference
NVDANvidia Corp.12.16%7.51%4.65%
GOOGL Alphabet Inc. Class A8.85%3.25%5.60%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 376.85%4.30%2.55%
AAPLApple Inc Ord1.94%6.59%4.65%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.05%2.77%0.28%
GOOGAlphabet, Inc., Class C3.22%2.59%0.63%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.3.52%2.02%1.50%
METAMeta Platform Inc 3.49%1.92%1.57%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc3.50%1.47%2.03%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc1.08%3.62%2.54%

86.1% of GSGO is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

GSGOVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GSGO or VOO?

GSGO has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between GSGO and VOO?

86.1% of GSGO's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 48.4% of VOO's is in holdings GSGO also owns. They hold 41 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in GSGO and 504 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, GSGO or VOO?

GSGO yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than GSGO?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.