GSGO vs IVV
Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GSGO or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GSGO | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $177M | $850.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% |
| Holdings | 107 | 1,018 |
| YTD Return | +2.72% | +11.09%Best |
| 1Y Return | +4.07% | +11.71%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.10% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.55% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.5% | 13.4%Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 53.7% | 38.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 24, 1999 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
GSGO vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GSGO vs IVV Performance
Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF (GSGO) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GSGO returned +4.07% while IVV returned +11.71%. Year to date, GSGO is up 2.72% versus a gain of 11.09% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GSGO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.5% compared with 13.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GSGO charges 0.45% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GSGO currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
85.7% of GSGO's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 49.8% of IVV's money is in holdings GSGO also owns.
Most of GSGO is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
40 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in GSGO and 505 in IVV, against full books of 107 and 1,018.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 459 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for GSGO (49.8% of the fund), and 9 for GSGO that do not appear in IVV (6.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GSGO | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 12.24% | 8.04% | 4.20% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 7.12% | 5.95% | 1.17% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 9.34% | 3.06% | 6.28% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 2.28% | 7.51% | 5.23% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 5.39% | 2.44% | 2.95% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 3.37% | 2.45% | 0.92% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.22% | 1.40% | 2.82% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.74% | 1.55% | 2.19% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.62% | 2.47% | 0.15% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.07% | 3.74% | 2.67% |
85.7% of GSGO is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GSGO or IVV?
GSGO has an expense ratio of 0.45% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GSGO or IVV?
Over the past year GSGO returned +4.07% vs +11.71% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GSGO or IVV?
GSGO has been the more volatile fund at 20.5% annualized versus 13.4% for IVV.
Should I hold both GSGO and IVV?
GSGO and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GSGO and IVV?
85.7% of GSGO's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 49.8% of IVV's is in holdings GSGO also owns. They hold 40 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in GSGO and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, GSGO or IVV?
GSGO yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than GSGO?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.