GUNR vs VYM
FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GUNR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GUNR | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.46% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $6.9B | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.33% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 177 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +23.49% | +15.34% | |
| 1Y Return | +39.55% | +23.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.91% | +19.22% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.24% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.6% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -49.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Flexshares Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2011 | Nov 10, 2006 |
GUNR vs VYM Performance
FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR) is a ETF from Flexshares Trust and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GUNR returned +39.55% while VYM returned +23.24%. Year to date, GUNR is up 23.49% versus a gain of 15.34% for VYM.
Over three years, GUNR compounded at +15.91% per year against +19.22% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +13.24% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +5.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GUNR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -49.7% for GUNR and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GUNR charges 0.46% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $46 vs $4 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GUNR currently yields 2.33% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
GUNR and VYM share 22 holdings out of 711 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GUNR or VYM?
GUNR has an expense ratio of 0.46% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GUNR or VYM?
Over the past year GUNR returned +39.55% vs +23.24% for VYM, so GUNR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), GUNR annualized +5.04% vs +7.04% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GUNR or VYM?
GUNR has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GUNR -49.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both GUNR and VYM?
GUNR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GUNR and VYM?
GUNR and VYM share 22 common holdings with a 6.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 711 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GUNR or VYM?
GUNR yields 2.33% while VYM yields 2.24%, so GUNR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.