GUNR vs VOO
FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. GUNR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GUNR | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.46% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $6.9B | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.33% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 177 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +23.49% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +39.55% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.91% | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.24% | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.6% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -49.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Flexshares Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2011 | Sep 7, 2010 |
GUNR vs VOO Performance
FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR) is a ETF from Flexshares Trust and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GUNR returned +39.55% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, GUNR is up 23.49% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Over three years, GUNR compounded at +15.91% per year against +22.06% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +13.24% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs +5.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GUNR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -49.7% for GUNR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GUNR charges 0.46% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $46 vs $3 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GUNR currently yields 2.33% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
GUNR and VOO share 20 holdings out of 615 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GUNR or VOO?
GUNR has an expense ratio of 0.46% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $43 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GUNR or VOO?
Over the past year GUNR returned +39.55% vs +21.87% for VOO, so GUNR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), GUNR annualized +5.04% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GUNR or VOO?
GUNR has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: GUNR -49.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both GUNR and VOO?
GUNR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GUNR and VOO?
GUNR and VOO share 20 common holdings with a 2.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 615 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GUNR or VOO?
GUNR yields 2.33% while VOO yields 1.08%, so GUNR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.