GUNR vs IVV
Northern Trust Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GUNR or IVV?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GUNR led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. GUNR is less concentrated, with 35.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GUNR | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.46% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $7.3B | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.16% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 177 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +21.36%Best | +12.01% |
| 1Y Return | +31.49%Best | +16.48% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.46% | +21.21%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.54% | +12.95%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.5% | 14.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -49.7% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,052 | $18,384Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.9%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | Northern Trust Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2011 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 22, 2011 to Sep 14, 2026 (15 years).
GUNR vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 15 years both funds cover.
GUNR vs IVV Performance
Northern Trust Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources ETF (GUNR) is an ETF from Northern Trust Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GUNR returned +31.49% while IVV returned +16.48%. Year to date, GUNR is up 21.36% versus a gain of 12.01% for IVV.
Over three years, GUNR compounded at +13.46% per year against +21.21% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +12.54% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +14.14% annualized vs +4.90%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GUNR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.5% compared with 14.2% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -49.7% for GUNR and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GUNR charges 0.46% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $46 vs $3 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GUNR currently yields 2.16% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
31.0% of GUNR's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 2.9% of IVV's money is in holdings GUNR also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
20 positions in common, counted across the 132 positions we hold weights for in GUNR and 490 in IVV, against full books of 177 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 462 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for GUNR (95.7% of the fund), and 13 for GUNR that do not appear in IVV (4.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GUNR | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 4.83% | 1.01% | 3.82% |
| CTVACorteva Inc Ctva | 4.85% | 0.09% | 4.76% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 3.58% | 0.58% | 3.00% |
| ADMArcher-Daniels-Midland Co. | 3.04% | 0.06% | 2.98% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 2.29% | 0.20% | 2.09% |
| FCXFreeport-mcmoran Copper & Gold Inc. | 1.72% | 0.16% | 1.56% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 1.51% | 0.24% | 1.27% |
| CFCf Industries Holdings Inc. | 1.69% | 0.03% | 1.66% |
| TSNTyson Foods Inc. Class A | 1.36% | 0.02% | 1.34% |
| BGBunge Global Sa Common Shares | 1.26% | 0.02% | 1.24% |
31.0% of GUNR is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GUNR or IVV?
GUNR has an expense ratio of 0.46% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $43 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GUNR or IVV?
Over the past year GUNR returned +31.49% vs +16.48% for IVV, so GUNR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), GUNR annualized +4.90% vs +14.14% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GUNR or IVV?
GUNR has been the more volatile fund at 18.5% annualized versus 14.2% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GUNR -49.7% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both GUNR and IVV?
GUNR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GUNR and IVV?
31.0% of GUNR's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 2.9% of IVV's is in holdings GUNR also owns. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 132 positions we hold weights for in GUNR and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, GUNR or IVV?
GUNR yields 2.16% while IVV yields 1.06%, so GUNR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than GUNR?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GUNR led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. GUNR is less concentrated, with 35.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.