GUNR vs VTI
FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GUNR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GUNR | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.46% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $6.9B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.33% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 177 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +23.49% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +39.55% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.91% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.24% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -49.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Flexshares Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2011 | May 24, 2001 |
GUNR vs VTI Performance
FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR) is a ETF from Flexshares Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GUNR returned +39.55% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, GUNR is up 23.49% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, GUNR compounded at +15.91% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +13.24% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs +5.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GUNR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -49.7% for GUNR and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GUNR charges 0.46% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $46 vs $3 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GUNR currently yields 2.33% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GUNR and VTI share 28 holdings out of 2889 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GUNR or VTI?
GUNR has an expense ratio of 0.46% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $43 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GUNR or VTI?
Over the past year GUNR returned +39.55% vs +22.35% for VTI, so GUNR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), GUNR annualized +5.04% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GUNR or VTI?
GUNR has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GUNR -49.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GUNR and VTI?
GUNR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GUNR and VTI?
GUNR and VTI share 28 common holdings with a 2.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2889 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GUNR or VTI?
GUNR yields 2.33% while VTI yields 1.07%, so GUNR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.