GUNR vs VTI
Northern Trust Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, GUNR or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GUNR led over 1Y and 5Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GUNR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.46% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $7.3B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.16% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 177 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +22.42%Best | +11.53% |
| 1Y Return | +32.64%Best | +15.74% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.91% | +20.67%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.26%Best | +11.59% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.5% | 14.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -49.7% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,829Best | $17,303 |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.9% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Northern Trust Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2011 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 22, 2011 to Sep 15, 2026 (15 years).
GUNR vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 15 years both funds cover.
GUNR vs VTI Performance
Northern Trust Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources ETF (GUNR) is an ETF from Northern Trust Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GUNR returned +32.64% while VTI returned +15.74%. Year to date, GUNR is up 22.42% versus a gain of 11.53% for VTI.
Over three years, GUNR compounded at +13.91% per year against +20.67% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +12.26% and +11.59% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.81% annualized vs +4.96%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GUNR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.5% compared with 14.5% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -49.7% for GUNR and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GUNR charges 0.46% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $46 vs $3 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GUNR currently yields 2.16% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
34.4% of GUNR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.8% of VTI's money is in holdings GUNR also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
31 positions in common, counted across the 132 positions we hold weights for in GUNR and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 177 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,119 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for GUNR (94.7% of the fund), and 2 for GUNR that do not appear in VTI (0.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GUNR | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 4.83% | 0.89% | 3.94% |
| CTVACorteva Inc Ctva | 4.85% | 0.07% | 4.78% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 3.58% | 0.52% | 3.06% |
| ADMArcher-Daniels-Midland Co. | 3.04% | 0.05% | 2.99% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 2.29% | 0.14% | 2.15% |
| FCXFreeport-mcmoran Copper & Gold Inc. | 1.72% | 0.12% | 1.60% |
| CFCf Industries Holdings Inc. | 1.69% | 0.03% | 1.66% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 1.51% | 0.20% | 1.31% |
| TSNTyson Foods Inc. Class A | 1.36% | 0.02% | 1.34% |
| BGBunge Global Sa Common Shares | 1.26% | 0.02% | 1.24% |
34.4% of GUNR is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GUNR or VTI?
GUNR has an expense ratio of 0.46% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $43 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GUNR or VTI?
Over the past year GUNR returned +32.64% vs +15.74% for VTI, so GUNR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), GUNR annualized +4.96% vs +13.81% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GUNR or VTI?
GUNR has been the more volatile fund at 18.5% annualized versus 14.5% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GUNR -49.7% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both GUNR and VTI?
GUNR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GUNR and VTI?
34.4% of GUNR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.8% of VTI's is in holdings GUNR also owns. They hold 31 positions in common, counted across the 132 positions we hold weights for in GUNR and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, GUNR or VTI?
GUNR yields 2.16% while VTI yields 1.03%, so GUNR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than GUNR?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GUNR led over 1Y and 5Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.