GURU vs VYM
Global X Guru Index ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, GURU or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GURU led over 3Y and the full window, VYM over 1Y and 5Y. GURU is less concentrated, with 14.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GURU | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $62M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.08% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 88 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +8.45% | +12.87%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.78% | +17.25%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.19%Best | +17.66% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.61% | +11.98%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.6% | 13.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -38.5% | -35.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,772 | $17,608Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 14.4%Best | 26.1% |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 4, 2012 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 5, 2012 to Sep 15, 2026 (14.3 years).
GURU vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.3 years both funds cover.
GURU vs VYM Performance
Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GURU returned +13.78% while VYM returned +17.25%. Year to date, GURU is up 8.45% versus a gain of 12.87% for VYM.
Over three years, GURU compounded at +22.19% per year against +17.66% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +6.61% and +11.98% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, GURU has the edge at +12.05% annualized vs +10.52%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GURU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 13.1% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.5% for GURU and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GURU charges 0.75% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $4 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GURU currently yields 0.08% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
13.0% of GURU's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 13.7% of VYM's money is in holdings GURU also owns.
VYM and GURU share little of their money.
10 positions in common, counted across the 80 positions we hold weights for in GURU and 557 in VYM, against full books of 88 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 518 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for GURU (83.3% of the fund), and 64 for GURU that do not appear in VYM (79.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GURU | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.21% | 7.35% | 6.14% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.26% | 3.82% | 2.56% |
| MSMorgan Stanley | 1.24% | 0.96% | 0.28% |
| BLKBlackrock Funding Inc/De | 1.26% | 0.68% | 0.58% |
| CVSCvs Corp | 1.33% | 0.54% | 0.79% |
| TRGPTarga Resources Corp Preferred | 1.36% | 0.23% | 1.13% |
| EXEExpand Energy Corp | 1.36% | 0.09% | 1.27% |
| SMSm Energy Co | 1.37% | 0.03% | 1.34% |
| ACIAlbertsons Cos. Llc / Safeway Inc. / New Albertsons Inc. | 1.31% | 0.02% | 1.29% |
| MKTXMarketaxess Holdings Inc?.? | 1.28% | 0.02% | 1.26% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GURU and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GURU or VYM?
GURU has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GURU or VYM?
Over the past year GURU returned +13.78% vs +17.25% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), GURU annualized +12.05% vs +10.52% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GURU or VYM?
GURU has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 13.1% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GURU -38.5% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both GURU and VYM?
GURU and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GURU and VYM?
13.7% of VYM's money is in holdings GURU also owns. 13.7% of VYM's is in holdings GURU also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 80 positions we hold weights for in GURU and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, GURU or VYM?
GURU yields 0.08% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than GURU?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GURU led over 3Y and the full window, VYM over 1Y and 5Y. GURU is less concentrated, with 14.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.