GURU vs VOO
Global X Guru Index ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GURU or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. GURU led over 3Y, VOO over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. GURU is less concentrated, with 14.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GURU | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $62M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.08% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 88 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +10.62% | +12.50%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.47% | +17.58%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.59%Best | +21.27% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.95% | +12.95%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.6% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -38.5% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,993 | $18,384Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 14.4%Best | 36.4% |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 4, 2012 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 5, 2012 to Sep 11, 2026 (14.3 years).
GURU vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.3 years both funds cover.
GURU vs VOO Performance
Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GURU returned +15.47% while VOO returned +17.58%. Year to date, GURU is up 10.62% versus a gain of 12.50% for VOO.
Over three years, GURU compounded at +22.59% per year against +21.27% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +6.95% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.94% annualized vs +12.22%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GURU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.5% for GURU and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GURU charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GURU currently yields 0.08% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
46.0% of GURU's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 41.6% of VOO's money is in holdings GURU also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 63 days apart, GURU as of Sep 1, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
37 positions in common, counted across the 80 positions we hold weights for in GURU and 505 in VOO, against full books of 88 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 459 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for GURU (57.8% of the fund), and 36 for GURU that do not appear in VOO (45.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GURU | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 1.24% | 7.51% | 6.27% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.37% | 6.59% | 5.22% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 1.34% | 4.30% | 2.96% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.25% | 3.62% | 2.37% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 1.25% | 3.25% | 2.00% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.21% | 2.77% | 1.56% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 1.30% | 1.92% | 0.62% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.18% | 2.02% | 0.84% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.25% | 1.47% | 0.22% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 1.26% | 1.26% | 0.00% |
46.0% of GURU is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GURU or VOO?
GURU has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GURU or VOO?
Over the past year GURU returned +15.47% vs +17.58% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), GURU annualized +12.22% vs +13.94% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GURU or VOO?
GURU has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: GURU -38.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both GURU and VOO?
GURU and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GURU and VOO?
46.0% of GURU's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 41.6% of VOO's is in holdings GURU also owns. They hold 37 positions in common, counted across the 80 positions we hold weights for in GURU and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, GURU or VOO?
GURU yields 0.08% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than GURU?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. GURU led over 3Y, VOO over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. GURU is less concentrated, with 14.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.