GURU vs IVV
Global X Guru Index ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GURU delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GURU | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $64M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.08% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 91 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +12.76% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.91% | +20.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.80% | +21.71% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.55% | +12.87% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -38.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 4, 2012 | May 15, 2000 |
GURU vs IVV Performance
Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GURU returned +23.91% while IVV returned +20.63%. Year to date, GURU is up 13.43% versus a gain of 12.76% for IVV.
Over three years, GURU compounded at +23.80% per year against +21.71% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +7.55% and +12.87% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, GURU has the edge at +12.46% annualized vs +6.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GURU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.5% for GURU and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GURU charges 0.75% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GURU currently yields 0.08% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
GURU and IVV share 39 holdings out of 552 unique holdings combined, representing a 15.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GURU or IVV?
GURU has an expense ratio of 0.75% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GURU or IVV?
Over the past year GURU returned +23.91% vs +20.63% for IVV, so GURU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), GURU annualized +12.46% vs +6.99% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GURU or IVV?
GURU has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GURU -38.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GURU and IVV?
GURU and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between GURU and IVV?
GURU and IVV share 39 common holdings with a 15.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 552 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GURU or IVV?
GURU yields 0.08% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.