GUSA vs VTI
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta US 1000 Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, GUSA or VTI?
Nearly the same fund. VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GUSA | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.10% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2.4B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.99% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 1,009 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +11.87% | +12.08%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.93% | +16.31%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.65% | +20.83%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.89% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4%Tie | 15.4%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -19.6% | -19.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.4 years | $17,936 | $17,992Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 34.9% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 5, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 12, 2022 to Sep 14, 2026 (4.4 years).
GUSA vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.4 years both funds cover.
GUSA vs VTI Performance
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta US 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GUSA returned +15.93% while VTI returned +16.31%. Year to date, GUSA is up 11.87% versus a gain of 12.08% for VTI.
Over three years, GUSA compounded at +20.65% per year against +20.83% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +14.28% annualized vs +14.20%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GUSA and VTI have been equally volatile, both at 15.4% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.6% for GUSA and -19.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 1.00. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GUSA charges 0.10% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $3 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GUSA currently yields 0.99% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
98.9% of GUSA's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 95.1% of VTI's money is in holdings GUSA also owns.
Most of GUSA is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
962 positions in common, counted across the 1,006 positions we hold weights for in GUSA and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 1,009 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 244 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for GUSA (2.8% of the fund), and 19 for GUSA that do not appear in VTI (0.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GUSA | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.18% | 6.40% | 0.78% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.60% | 6.29% | 0.31% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.21% | 4.79% | 0.42% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.48% | 3.65% | 0.17% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 2.78% | 2.90% | 0.12% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.45% | 2.56% | 0.11% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.39% | 2.31% | 0.08% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.80% | 1.70% | 0.10% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.49% | 1.29% | 0.20% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.55% | 1.22% | 0.33% |
98.9% of GUSA is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GUSA or VTI?
GUSA has an expense ratio of 0.10% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $7 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GUSA or VTI?
Over the past year GUSA returned +15.93% vs +16.31% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), GUSA annualized +14.20% vs +14.28% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GUSA or VTI?
GUSA and VTI have been equally volatile, both at 15.4% annualized. Worst drawdown: GUSA -19.6% vs VTI -19.4%.
Should I hold both GUSA and VTI?
GUSA and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 1.00, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GUSA and VTI?
98.9% of GUSA's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 95.1% of VTI's is in holdings GUSA also owns. They hold 962 positions in common, counted across the 1,006 positions we hold weights for in GUSA and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, GUSA or VTI?
GUSA yields 0.99% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than GUSA?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.