GXLC vs VYM

GXLC vs VYM
See what your portfolio actually owns
Your funds unpacked, overlap, fees and score, free on screen. The full report is $25, once. Download sample.
X-ray my portfolio free

Quick Verdict

GXLC has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.

Lower Fees: GXLCHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGXLCVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.02%0.04%
AUM$5M$81.6B
Dividend Yield0.64%2.24%
Holdings506616
YTD Return+12.86%+15.34%
1Y Return+16.56%+23.24%
3Y Return (annualized)-+19.22%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.21%
Volatility (annualized)-14.6%
Max Drawdown-9.1%-58.8%
Fund FamilyGlobal X by mirae AssetVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionSep 23, 2025Nov 10, 2006

GXLC vs VYM Performance

Global X US 500 ETF (GXLC) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GXLC returned +16.56% while VYM returned +23.24%. Year to date, GXLC is up 12.86% versus a gain of 15.34% for VYM.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.1% for GXLC and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GXLC charges 0.02% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $2 vs $4 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GXLC currently yields 0.64% against 2.24% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

32.5%overlap

GXLC and VYM share 217 holdings out of 880 unique holdings combined, representing a 32.5% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in GXLCWeight in VYMDifference
AVGO2.90%7.29%4.39%
JPM1.44%3.38%1.94%
JNJ0.92%2.54%1.62%
XOMProProPro
CSCOProProPro
CATProProPro
ABBVProProPro
BACProProPro
UNHProProPro
HDProProPro
FundXLS Pro
See the top 10 holdings GXLC shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every position in this table.
Unlock FundXLS Pro$45/quarter Pro · Cancel anytime

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GXLC or VYM?

GXLC has an expense ratio of 0.02% while VYM charges 0.04%. GXLC is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $2 per year of difference.

Which performed better, GXLC or VYM?

Over the past year GXLC returned +16.56% vs +23.24% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

What is the holdings overlap between GXLC and VYM?

GXLC and VYM share 217 common holdings with a 32.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 880 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, GXLC or VYM?

GXLC yields 0.64% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See what your portfolio actually owns
Your funds unpacked, overlap, fees and score, free on screen. The full report is $25, once. Download sample.
X-ray my portfolio free