GXLC vs IVV

GXLC vs IVV
See what your portfolio actually owns
Your funds unpacked, overlap, fees and score, free on screen. The full report is $25, once. Download sample.
X-ray my portfolio free

Quick Verdict

GXLC has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.

Lower Fees: GXLCHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGXLCIVVWinner
Expense Ratio0.02%0.03%
AUM$5M$907.0B
Dividend Yield0.64%1.10%
Holdings506508
YTD Return+12.86%+12.71%
1Y Return+16.56%+21.89%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.08%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.96%
Volatility (annualized)-15.1%
Max Drawdown-9.1%-56.5%
Fund FamilyGlobal X by mirae AssetiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionSep 23, 2025May 15, 2000

GXLC vs IVV Performance

Global X US 500 ETF (GXLC) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GXLC returned +16.56% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, GXLC is up 12.86% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.1% for GXLC and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GXLC charges 0.02% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $2 vs $3 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GXLC currently yields 0.64% against 1.10% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

91.7%overlap

GXLC and IVV share 413 holdings out of 586 unique holdings combined, representing a 91.7% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in GXLCWeight in IVVDifference
NVDA7.41%7.76%0.35%
AAPL6.62%7.44%0.82%
MSFT5.39%4.57%0.82%
AMZNProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
AVGOProProPro
GOOGProProPro
METAProProPro
TSLAProProPro
MUProProPro
FundXLS Pro
See the top 10 holdings GXLC shares with IVV
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every position in this table.
Unlock FundXLS Pro$45/quarter Pro · Cancel anytime

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GXLC or IVV?

GXLC has an expense ratio of 0.02% while IVV charges 0.03%. GXLC is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.

Which performed better, GXLC or IVV?

Over the past year GXLC returned +16.56% vs +21.89% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

What is the holdings overlap between GXLC and IVV?

GXLC and IVV share 413 common holdings with a 91.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 586 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, GXLC or IVV?

GXLC yields 0.64% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See what your portfolio actually owns
Your funds unpacked, overlap, fees and score, free on screen. The full report is $25, once. Download sample.
X-ray my portfolio free