GXLC vs QQQ

GXLC vs QQQ
See what your portfolio actually owns
Your funds unpacked, overlap, fees and score, free on screen. The full report is $25, once. Download sample.
X-ray my portfolio free

Quick Verdict

GXLC has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. GXLC offers more diversification with 506 holdings.

Lower Fees: GXLCHigher Returns: QQQMore Diversified: GXLC

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGXLCQQQWinner
Expense Ratio0.02%0.18%
AUM$5M$496.3B
Dividend Yield0.64%0.44%
Holdings506108
YTD Return+12.86%+16.19%
1Y Return+16.56%+25.22%
3Y Return (annualized)-+25.47%
5Y Return (annualized)-+14.34%
Volatility (annualized)-30.6%
Max Drawdown-9.1%-83.0%
Fund FamilyGlobal X by mirae AssetInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionSep 23, 2025Mar 10, 1999

GXLC vs QQQ Performance

Global X US 500 ETF (GXLC) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year GXLC returned +16.56% while QQQ returned +25.22%. Year to date, GXLC is up 12.86% versus a gain of 16.19% for QQQ.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.1% for GXLC and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GXLC charges 0.02% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $2 vs $18 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GXLC currently yields 0.64% against 0.44% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

53.4%overlap

GXLC and QQQ share 92 holdings out of 504 unique holdings combined, representing a 53.4% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in GXLCWeight in QQQDifference
NVDA7.41%8.44%1.03%
AAPL6.62%7.27%0.65%
MSFT5.39%5.76%0.37%
AMZNProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
AVGOProProPro
GOOGProProPro
MUProProPro
METAProProPro
AMDProProPro
FundXLS Pro
See the top 10 holdings GXLC shares with QQQ
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every position in this table.
Unlock FundXLS Pro$45/quarter Pro · Cancel anytime

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GXLC or QQQ?

GXLC has an expense ratio of 0.02% while QQQ charges 0.18%. GXLC is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $16 per year of difference.

Which performed better, GXLC or QQQ?

Over the past year GXLC returned +16.56% vs +25.22% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

What is the holdings overlap between GXLC and QQQ?

GXLC and QQQ share 92 common holdings with a 53.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 504 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, GXLC or QQQ?

GXLC yields 0.64% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so GXLC currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See what your portfolio actually owns
Your funds unpacked, overlap, fees and score, free on screen. The full report is $25, once. Download sample.
X-ray my portfolio free