HAWG vs QQQ

HAWG vs QQQ

Which is better, HAWG or QQQ?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.4%.

Lower Fees: QQQLess Concentrated: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricHAWGQQQ
Expense Ratio1.35%0.18%Best
AUM$99M$437.3B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.43%
Holdings1,027208
YTD Return-2.09%+12.62%Best
1Y Return-+11.32%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.90%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.43%
Top 10 Weight53.4%46.9%Best
Fund FamilyHoward Capital ManagementInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
InceptionAug 13, 2026Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

HAWG vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

HAWG vs QQQ Performance

HCM Hedged Equity ETF (HAWG) is an ETF from Howard Capital Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, HAWG is down 2.09% versus a gain of 12.62% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

HAWG charges 1.35% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $135 vs $18 annually, a gap of $117 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HAWG currently yields 0.00% against 0.43% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

HAWG already in QQQ75.7%
QQQ already in HAWG96.1%

75.7% of HAWG's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 96.1% of QQQ's money is in holdings HAWG also owns.

Most of QQQ is already inside HAWG. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

94 positions in common, counted across the 488 positions we hold weights for in HAWG and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 1,027 and 208.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 2 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for HAWG (1.5% of the fund), and 382 for HAWG that do not appear in QQQ (22.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in HAWGWeight in QQQDifference
NVDANvidia Corp10.57%8.05%2.52%
AAPLApple Inc10.22%7.68%2.54%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp8.25%6.16%2.09%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc5.12%4.23%0.89%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc4.27%3.15%1.12%
METAMeta Platforms Inc3.39%3.37%0.02%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.2.20%4.47%2.27%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C3.67%2.93%0.74%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.35%2.52%0.83%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc1.92%3.90%1.98%

96.1% of QQQ is already inside HAWG.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

HAWGQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, HAWG or QQQ?

HAWG has an expense ratio of 1.35% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $117 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between HAWG and QQQ?

96.1% of QQQ's money is in holdings HAWG also owns. 96.1% of QQQ's is in holdings HAWG also owns. They hold 94 positions in common, counted across the 488 positions we hold weights for in HAWG and 101 in QQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, HAWG or QQQ?

HAWG yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.43%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than HAWG?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.