HEMI vs QQQ

HEMI vs QQQ

Which is better, HEMI or QQQ?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. HEMI is less concentrated, with 46.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.

Lower Fees: QQQLess Concentrated: HEMI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricHEMIQQQ
Expense Ratio0.49%0.18%Best
AUM$36M$483.5B
Dividend Yield6.49%0.44%
Holdings85107
YTD Return+1.21%+15.18%Best
1Y Return-+19.65%
3Y Return (annualized)-+24.60%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.94%
Top 10 Weight46.0%Best46.5%
Fund FamilyHartford FundsInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
InceptionDec 16, 2025Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

HEMI vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

HEMI vs QQQ Performance

Hartford Equity Premium Income ETF (HEMI) is an ETF from Hartford Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, HEMI is up 1.21% versus a gain of 15.18% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

HEMI charges 0.49% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $18 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HEMI currently yields 6.49% against 0.44% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

HEMI already in QQQ56.1%
QQQ already in HEMI62.7%

56.1% of HEMI's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 62.7% of QQQ's money is in holdings HEMI also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

26 positions in common, counted across the 76 positions we hold weights for in HEMI and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 85 and 107.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 70 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for HEMI (34.8% of the fund), and 48 for HEMI that do not appear in QQQ (39.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in HEMIWeight in QQQDifference
NVDANvidia Corp8.54%8.44%0.10%
AAPLApple, Inc6.62%7.27%0.65%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp6.88%5.76%1.12%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A6.43%3.36%3.07%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.95%4.67%0.28%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.41%3.16%0.25%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.2.11%4.43%2.32%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc2.11%3.45%1.34%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.52%2.78%0.26%
WMTWalmart, Inc.1.05%2.41%1.36%

62.7% of QQQ is already inside HEMI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

HEMIQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, HEMI or QQQ?

HEMI has an expense ratio of 0.49% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between HEMI and QQQ?

62.7% of QQQ's money is in holdings HEMI also owns. 62.7% of QQQ's is in holdings HEMI also owns. They hold 26 positions in common, counted across the 76 positions we hold weights for in HEMI and 102 in QQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, HEMI or QQQ?

HEMI yields 6.49% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so HEMI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than HEMI?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. HEMI is less concentrated, with 46.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.