HEMI vs IVV

HEMI vs IVV

Which is better, HEMI or IVV?

IVV costs less.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.0%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricHEMIIVV
Expense Ratio0.49%0.03%Best
AUM$36M$876.4B
Dividend Yield6.49%1.06%
Holdings85508
YTD Return+1.21%+11.51%Best
1Y Return-+15.96%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.01%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.66%
Top 10 Weight46.0%37.8%Best
Fund FamilyHartford FundsiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 16, 2025May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

HEMI vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

HEMI vs IVV Performance

Hartford Equity Premium Income ETF (HEMI) is an ETF from Hartford Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, HEMI is up 1.21% versus a gain of 11.51% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

HEMI charges 0.49% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HEMI currently yields 6.49% against 1.06% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

HEMI already in IVV91.5%
IVV already in HEMI52.2%

91.5% of HEMI's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 52.2% of IVV's money is in holdings HEMI also owns.

Most of HEMI is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

67 positions in common, counted across the 76 positions we hold weights for in HEMI and 490 in IVV, against full books of 85 and 508.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 416 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for HEMI (46.6% of the fund), and 8 for HEMI that do not appear in IVV (4.4%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in HEMIWeight in IVVDifference
NVDANvidia Corp8.54%8.07%0.47%
AAPLApple, Inc6.62%7.02%0.40%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp6.88%5.69%1.19%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A6.43%3.00%3.43%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.95%3.84%1.11%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.41%2.65%0.76%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.52%1.90%0.62%
JPMJpmorgan Chase2.38%1.44%0.94%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.2.11%1.63%0.48%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.2.17%1.38%0.79%

91.5% of HEMI is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

HEMIIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, HEMI or IVV?

HEMI has an expense ratio of 0.49% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between HEMI and IVV?

91.5% of HEMI's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 52.2% of IVV's is in holdings HEMI also owns. They hold 67 positions in common, counted across the 76 positions we hold weights for in HEMI and 490 in IVV.

Which pays a higher dividend, HEMI or IVV?

HEMI yields 6.49% while IVV yields 1.06%, so HEMI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than HEMI?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.