HFGO vs REGS
Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF vs Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF
Which is better, HFGO or REGS?
HFGO has been ahead.
REGS has a lower expense ratio. HFGO led over 1Y. REGS is less concentrated, with 49.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HFGO | REGS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.35%Best |
| AUM | $211M | $77M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 48 | 124 |
| YTD Return | +13.21% | +16.92%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.06% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.46% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.65% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 61.2% | 49.2%Best |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Nov 9, 2021 | Mar 16, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
HFGO vs REGS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
HFGO vs REGS Performance
Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO) is an ETF from Hartford Funds and Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF (REGS) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments. Year to date, HFGO is up 13.21% versus a gain of 16.92% for REGS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HFGO charges 0.59% per year while REGS charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $35 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HFGO currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for REGS.
Holdings Overlap
67.5% of HFGO's money is in holdings REGS also owns. 55.4% of REGS's money is in holdings HFGO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
15 positions in common, counted across the 46 positions we hold weights for in HFGO and 60 in REGS, against full books of 48 and 124.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 43 positions for REGS that do not appear in our book for HFGO (40.4% of the fund), and 25 for HFGO that do not appear in REGS (24.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HFGO | Weight in REGS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 16.55% | 11.05% | 5.50% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.81% | 8.14% | 3.33% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 9.88% | 1.68% | 8.20% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.41% | 5.63% | 0.22% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.33% | 4.84% | 0.49% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.54% | 4.73% | 0.19% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.82% | 3.42% | 0.40% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.50% | 2.17% | 2.33% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 1.01% | 4.79% | 3.78% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock | 2.85% | 1.88% | 0.97% |
67.5% of HFGO is already inside REGS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HFGO or REGS?
HFGO has an expense ratio of 0.59% while REGS charges 0.35%. REGS is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between HFGO and REGS?
67.5% of HFGO's money is in holdings REGS also owns. 55.4% of REGS's is in holdings HFGO also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 46 positions we hold weights for in HFGO and 60 in REGS.
Which pays a higher dividend, HFGO or REGS?
HFGO yields 0.00% while REGS yields 0.00%, so REGS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is REGS better than HFGO?
REGS has a lower expense ratio. HFGO led over 1Y. REGS is less concentrated, with 49.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.