HOID vs QQQ
Tuttle - Rareview Humanoid Robotics ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, HOID or QQQ?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HOID | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $474,725.33 | $476.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 33 | 312 |
| YTD Return | -3.67% | +11.27%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +12.28% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.18% |
| Top 10 Weight | 50.5% | 46.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Rareview Capital | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 15, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
HOID vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
HOID vs QQQ Performance
Tuttle - Rareview Humanoid Robotics ETF (HOID) is an ETF from Rareview Capital and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, HOID is down 3.67% versus a gain of 11.27% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HOID charges 0.75% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $18 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HOID currently yields 0.00% against 0.43% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
45.9% of HOID's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 22.7% of QQQ's money is in holdings HOID also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
12 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in HOID and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 33 and 312.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 31 and 101 positions we hold weights for.
QQQ holds 82 positions HOID does not, 74.8% of the fund.
Largest: AAPL 8.16%, MSFT 6.29%, MU 4.47%, AMD 3.69%, META 2.97%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HOID | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 4.75% | 8.00% | 3.25% |
| TSLATesla Motors Inc | 5.44% | 3.41% | 2.03% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.77% | 4.21% | 0.44% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 6.36% | 0.91% | 5.45% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.94% | 2.66% | 1.28% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 5.30% | 0.78% | 4.52% |
| CDNSCadence Design Systems Inc. | 3.40% | 0.40% | 3.00% |
| SNPSSynopsys Inc. | 3.31% | 0.40% | 2.91% |
| ADSKAutodesk, Inc. | 3.45% | 0.23% | 3.22% |
| TERTeradyne Inc - Common | 3.17% | 0.19% | 2.98% |
45.9% of HOID is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HOID or QQQ?
HOID has an expense ratio of 0.75% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between HOID and QQQ?
45.9% of HOID's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 22.7% of QQQ's is in holdings HOID also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in HOID and 101 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, HOID or QQQ?
HOID yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.43%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than HOID?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.