IBUY vs QQQ
Amplify Online Retail ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBUY | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $129M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.43% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 85 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -0.51% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.23% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.22% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -8.16% | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.9% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -73.0% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 19, 2016 | Mar 10, 1999 |
IBUY vs QQQ Performance
Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IBUY returned +2.23% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, IBUY is down 0.51% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, IBUY compounded at +17.22% per year against +25.96% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -8.16% and +14.54% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +10.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 28.9% for IBUY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -73.0% for IBUY and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBUY charges 0.65% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $18 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBUY currently yields 0.43% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
IBUY and QQQ share 11 holdings out of 174 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBUY or QQQ?
IBUY has an expense ratio of 0.65% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IBUY or QQQ?
Over the past year IBUY returned +2.23% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), IBUY annualized +10.96% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IBUY or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 28.9% for IBUY. Worst drawdown: IBUY -73.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both IBUY and QQQ?
IBUY and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IBUY and QQQ?
IBUY and QQQ share 11 common holdings with a 6.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 174 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBUY or QQQ?
IBUY yields 0.43% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.