IGA vs IVV

IGA vs IVV

Which is better, IGA or IVV?

Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IGA is less concentrated, with 16.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVLess Concentrated: IGA

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIGAIVV
Expense Ratio0.97%0.03%Best
AUM$157M$886.7B
Dividend Yield9.21%1.10%
Holdings251508
YTD Return+15.74%Best+13.39%
1Y Return+17.54%+20.08%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+20.07%+21.29%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+11.11%+12.88%Best
Volatility (annualized)16.0%15.1%Best
Max Drawdown-72.2%-56.5%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$16,934$18,327Best
Top 10 Weight16.0%Best37.9%
Fund FamilyVoya Investment ManagementiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionOct 26, 2005May 15, 2000

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 27, 2005 to Sep 4, 2026 (20.9 years).

IGA vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IGA vs IVV Performance

Voya Global Advantage and Premium Opportunity Fund (IGA) is an ETF from Voya Investment Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IGA returned +17.54% while IVV returned +20.08%. Year to date, IGA is up 15.74% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.

Over three years, IGA compounded at +20.07% per year against +21.29% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +11.11% and +12.88% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.83% annualized vs -0.48%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IGA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -72.2% for IGA and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IGA charges 0.97% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $97 vs $3 annually, a gap of $94 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IGA currently yields 9.21% against 1.10% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

IGA already in IVV54.0%
IVV already in IGA34.2%

54.0% of IGA's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 34.2% of IVV's money is in holdings IGA also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

The two holdings books were reported 66 days apart, IGA as of May 31, 2026 and IVV as of Aug 5, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

99 positions in common, counted across the 241 positions we hold weights for in IGA and 505 in IVV, against full books of 251 and 508.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 399 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for IGA (65.1% of the fund), and 42 for IGA that do not appear in IVV (14.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IGAWeight in IVVDifference
NVDANvidia Corp.0.57%7.98%7.41%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.Class A3.73%3.19%0.54%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 370.59%5.44%4.85%
METAMeta Platform Inc 1.47%1.94%0.47%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1.42%1.51%0.09%
JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common1.72%0.93%0.79%
CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares1.81%0.72%1.09%
ABBVAbbvie Inc.1.31%0.65%0.66%
KOCoca Cola Co.1.25%0.51%0.74%
PGProcter & Gamble Company0.80%0.51%0.29%

54.0% of IGA is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

IGAIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IGA or IVV?

IGA has an expense ratio of 0.97% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $94 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, IGA or IVV?

Over the past year IGA returned +17.54% vs +20.08% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), IGA annualized -0.48% vs +9.83% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, IGA or IVV?

IGA has been the more volatile fund at 16.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IGA -72.2% vs IVV -56.5%.

Should I hold both IGA and IVV?

IGA and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between IGA and IVV?

54.0% of IGA's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 34.2% of IVV's is in holdings IGA also owns. They hold 99 positions in common, counted across the 241 positions we hold weights for in IGA and 505 in IVV.

Which pays a higher dividend, IGA or IVV?

IGA yields 9.21% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IGA currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than IGA?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IGA is less concentrated, with 16.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.