IGD vs VYM
Voya Global Equity Dividend and Premium Opportunity Fund vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, IGD or VYM?
Each has led over a different period.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. IGD led over 3Y, VYM over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. IGD is less concentrated, with 15.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IGD | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.96% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $479M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 9.15% | 2.24% |
| Holdings | 251 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +20.81%Best | +14.82% |
| 1Y Return | +20.59% | +20.84%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.47%Best | +18.64% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.15% | +12.28%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.6% | 14.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -82.5% | -58.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,965 | $17,845Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 15.8%Best | 25.9% |
| Fund Family | Voya Investment Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 28, 2005 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 16, 2006 to Sep 4, 2026 (19.8 years).
IGD vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.8 years both funds cover.
IGD vs VYM Performance
Voya Global Equity Dividend and Premium Opportunity Fund (IGD) is an ETF from Voya Investment Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IGD returned +20.59% while VYM returned +20.84%. Year to date, IGD is up 20.81% versus a gain of 14.82% for VYM.
Over three years, IGD compounded at +20.47% per year against +18.64% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +11.15% and +12.28% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.00% annualized vs -3.10%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IGD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 14.5% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -82.5% for IGD and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IGD charges 0.96% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $96 vs $4 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IGD currently yields 9.15% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
41.9% of IGD's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 26.8% of VYM's money is in holdings IGD also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
85 positions in common, counted across the 241 positions we hold weights for in IGD and 603 in VYM, against full books of 251 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 487 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for IGD (70.9% of the fund), and 57 for IGD that do not appear in VYM (27.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IGD | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.72% | 2.54% | 0.82% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.81% | 1.93% | 0.12% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 1.31% | 1.85% | 0.54% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 1.25% | 1.31% | 0.06% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 0.80% | 1.42% | 0.62% |
| CCitigroup Inc. | 0.83% | 0.94% | 0.11% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 0.91% | 0.77% | 0.14% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 0.78% | 0.81% | 0.03% |
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 0.87% | 0.67% | 0.20% |
| PFEPfizer Inc | 0.89% | 0.57% | 0.32% |
41.9% of IGD is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IGD or VYM?
IGD has an expense ratio of 0.96% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IGD or VYM?
Over the past year IGD returned +20.59% vs +20.84% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IGD annualized -3.10% vs +7.00% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IGD or VYM?
IGD has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 14.5% for VYM. Worst drawdown: IGD -82.5% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both IGD and VYM?
IGD and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IGD and VYM?
41.9% of IGD's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 26.8% of VYM's is in holdings IGD also owns. They hold 85 positions in common, counted across the 241 positions we hold weights for in IGD and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, IGD or VYM?
IGD yields 9.15% while VYM yields 2.24%, so IGD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than IGD?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. IGD led over 3Y, VYM over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. IGD is less concentrated, with 15.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.