ISHP vs IVV
First Trust S-Network E-Commerce ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ISHP or IVV?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ISHP is less concentrated, with 18.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ISHP | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $5M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.11% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 130 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -11.81% | +12.24%Best |
| 1Y Return | -16.57% | +18.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.89% | +20.98%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.57% | +12.76%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.6% | 15.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -42.7% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,810 | $18,230Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 18.8%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2016 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 11, 2016 to Sep 9, 2026 (9.9 years).
ISHP vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.9 years both funds cover.
ISHP vs IVV Performance
First Trust S-Network E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ISHP returned -16.57% while IVV returned +18.61%. Year to date, ISHP is down 11.81% versus a gain of 12.24% for IVV.
Over three years, ISHP compounded at +9.89% per year against +20.98% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +1.57% and +12.76% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +14.58% annualized vs +6.37%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ISHP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.6% compared with 15.5% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.7% for ISHP and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ISHP charges 0.60% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ISHP currently yields 1.11% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
39.5% of ISHP's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 11.5% of IVV's money is in holdings ISHP also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
24 positions in common, counted across the 60 positions we hold weights for in ISHP and 505 in IVV, against full books of 130 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 473 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for ISHP (87.8% of the fund), and 10 for ISHP that do not appear in IVV (16.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ISHP | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.72% | 4.01% | 2.29% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 1.57% | 3.19% | 1.62% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 1.45% | 1.94% | 0.49% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 1.56% | 0.74% | 0.82% |
| BKNGPriceline.com, Inc. | 1.84% | 0.24% | 1.60% |
| PYPLPaypay Holdings, Inc. | 1.99% | 0.08% | 1.91% |
| EXPEExpedia Group Inc (consumer Discretionary) | 1.86% | 0.06% | 1.80% |
| GPNGlobal Payments Inc. | 1.83% | 0.03% | 1.80% |
| WSMWilliams-sonoma Inc | 1.76% | 0.04% | 1.72% |
| DASHDoordash Inc - A | 1.68% | 0.12% | 1.56% |
39.5% of ISHP is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ISHP or IVV?
ISHP has an expense ratio of 0.60% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ISHP or IVV?
Over the past year ISHP returned -16.57% vs +18.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), ISHP annualized +6.37% vs +14.58% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ISHP or IVV?
ISHP has been the more volatile fund at 20.6% annualized versus 15.5% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ISHP -42.7% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both ISHP and IVV?
ISHP and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ISHP and IVV?
39.5% of ISHP's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 11.5% of IVV's is in holdings ISHP also owns. They hold 24 positions in common, counted across the 60 positions we hold weights for in ISHP and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ISHP or IVV?
ISHP yields 1.11% while IVV yields 1.06%, so ISHP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ISHP?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ISHP is less concentrated, with 18.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.