ISHP vs VTI
First Trust S-Network E-Commerce ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ISHP or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ISHP is less concentrated, with 20.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ISHP | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $5M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.11% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 130 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -15.00% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | -19.65% | +15.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.31% | +23.41%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.76% | +12.83%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.6% | 15.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -42.7% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,386 | $18,286Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 20.0%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2016 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 11, 2016 to Oct 2, 2026 (10 years).
ISHP vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10 years both funds cover.
ISHP vs VTI Performance
First Trust S-Network E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ISHP returned -19.65% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, ISHP is down 15.00% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Over three years, ISHP compounded at +11.31% per year against +23.41% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +0.76% and +12.83% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +14.11% annualized vs +5.94%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ISHP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.6% compared with 15.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.7% for ISHP and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ISHP charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ISHP currently yields 1.11% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
48.1% of ISHP's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 10.5% of VTI's money is in holdings ISHP also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, ISHP as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
29 positions in common, counted across the 60 positions we hold weights for in ISHP and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 130 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,121 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for ISHP (87.0% of the fund), and 5 for ISHP that do not appear in VTI (7.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ISHP | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.68% | 3.65% | 1.97% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 1.53% | 2.90% | 1.37% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.68% | 1.70% | 0.02% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 1.55% | 0.68% | 0.87% |
| PYPLPaypay Holdings, Inc. | 1.94% | 0.06% | 1.88% |
| GPNGlobal Payments Inc. | 1.96% | 0.03% | 1.93% |
| ABNBAirbnb Inc | 1.88% | 0.08% | 1.80% |
| SNAPSnap Inc. | 1.94% | 0.01% | 1.93% |
| CPAYCorpay Inc | 1.92% | 0.03% | 1.89% |
| BKNGBooking Holdings, Inc. | 1.64% | 0.21% | 1.43% |
48.1% of ISHP is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ISHP or VTI?
ISHP has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ISHP or VTI?
Over the past year ISHP returned -19.65% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), ISHP annualized +5.94% vs +14.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ISHP or VTI?
ISHP has been the more volatile fund at 20.6% annualized versus 15.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ISHP -42.7% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both ISHP and VTI?
ISHP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ISHP and VTI?
48.1% of ISHP's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 10.5% of VTI's is in holdings ISHP also owns. They hold 29 positions in common, counted across the 60 positions we hold weights for in ISHP and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, ISHP or VTI?
ISHP yields 1.11% while VTI yields 1.03%, so ISHP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ISHP?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ISHP is less concentrated, with 20.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.