ISHP vs VTI
First Trust S-Network E-Commerce ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ISHP | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $6M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.14% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 66 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -6.59% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | -9.00% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.21% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.88% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2016 | May 24, 2001 |
ISHP vs VTI Performance
First Trust S-Network E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ISHP returned -9.00% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, ISHP is down 6.59% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, ISHP compounded at +13.21% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +2.88% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs +7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ISHP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.7% for ISHP and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ISHP charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ISHP currently yields 1.14% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
ISHP and VTI share 28 holdings out of 2819 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ISHP or VTI?
ISHP has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ISHP or VTI?
Over the past year ISHP returned -9.00% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), ISHP annualized +7.03% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ISHP or VTI?
ISHP has been the more volatile fund at 20.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ISHP -42.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ISHP and VTI?
ISHP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ISHP and VTI?
ISHP and VTI share 28 common holdings with a 6.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2819 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ISHP or VTI?
ISHP yields 1.14% while VTI yields 1.07%, so ISHP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.