IVV vs IYK
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs iShares US Consumer Staples ETF
Which is better, IVV or IYK?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, IYK over the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 66.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | IYK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.38% |
| AUM | $886.7B | $1.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 2.52% |
| Holdings | 508 | 57 |
| YTD Return | +13.39%Best | +12.79% |
| 1Y Return | +20.08%Best | +9.41% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.29%Best | +7.78% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.88%Best | +6.31% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 13.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -44.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,327Best | $13,579 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 66.0% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 12, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 16, 2000 to Sep 4, 2026 (26.2 years).
IVV vs IYK growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 26.2 years both funds cover.
IVV vs IYK Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares US Consumer Staples ETF (IYK) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% while IYK returned +9.41%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.39% versus a gain of 12.79% for IYK.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.29% per year against +7.78% for IYK; over five years the annualized figures are +12.88% and +6.31% respectively. Across the full 26-year window we track, IYK has the edge at +7.16% annualized vs +6.85%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.0% for IYK. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -44.1% for IYK. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while IYK charges 0.38%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $38 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 2.52% for IYK.
Holdings Overlap
3.7% of IVV's money is in holdings IYK also owns. 94.3% of IYK's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of IYK is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
34 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 54 in IYK, against full books of 508 and 57.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 18 positions for IYK that do not appear in our book for IVV (5.3% of the fund), and 463 for IVV that do not appear in IYK (95.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in IYK | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 0.51% | 13.01% | 12.50% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 0.51% | 12.86% | 12.35% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 0.44% | 11.27% | 10.83% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 0.29% | 7.35% | 7.06% |
| CVSCvs Health Corp. | 0.19% | 4.34% | 4.15% |
| MOAltria Group Inc | 0.17% | 4.01% | 3.84% |
| MCKMckesson Corp. | 0.16% | 4.00% | 3.84% |
| MDLZMondelez International Inc Com A Npv | 0.12% | 3.22% | 3.10% |
| CLColgate-Palmolive Co | 0.11% | 3.07% | 2.96% |
| MNSTMonster Beverage Corp. | 0.10% | 2.87% | 2.77% |
94.3% of IYK is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or IYK?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while IYK charges 0.38%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or IYK?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% vs +9.41% for IYK, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (26 years), IVV annualized +6.85% vs +7.16% for IYK. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or IYK?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.0% for IYK. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs IYK -44.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and IYK?
IVV and IYK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and IYK?
94.3% of IYK's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 94.3% of IYK's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 34 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 54 in IYK.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or IYK?
IVV yields 1.10% while IYK yields 2.52%, so IYK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IYK better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, IYK over the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 66.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.