IVV vs KXI
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF
Which is better, IVV or KXI?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | KXI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.38% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $1.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 2.35% |
| Holdings | 508 | 112 |
| YTD Return | +11.57%Best | +5.02% |
| 1Y Return | +17.57%Best | +5.09% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.71%Best | +6.77% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.80%Best | +4.02% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 12.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -43.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,262Best | $12,178 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 49.5% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 12, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 21, 2006 to Sep 10, 2026 (20 years).
IVV vs KXI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 20 years both funds cover.
IVV vs KXI Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF (KXI) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while KXI returned +5.09%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.57% versus a gain of 5.02% for KXI.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.71% per year against +6.77% for KXI; over five years the annualized figures are +12.80% and +4.02% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.56% annualized vs +5.68%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 12.7% for KXI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -43.9% for KXI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while KXI charges 0.38%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $38 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 2.35% for KXI.
Holdings Overlap
4.7% of IVV's money is in holdings KXI also owns. 59.5% of KXI's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
35 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 94 in KXI, against full books of 508 and 112.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 2 positions for KXI that do not appear in our book for IVV (0.4% of the fund), and 460 for IVV that do not appear in KXI (94.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in KXI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 0.74% | 8.31% | 7.57% |
| COSTCostco Wholesale Corp. | 0.63% | 7.22% | 6.59% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 0.51% | 5.96% | 5.45% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 0.44% | 4.54% | 4.10% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 0.51% | 4.46% | 3.95% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 0.29% | 4.46% | 4.17% |
| MOAltria Group Inc. | 0.17% | 3.18% | 3.01% |
| MDLZMondelez International Inc. Class A | 0.12% | 2.01% | 1.89% |
| CLColgate-Palmolive Co | 0.11% | 1.98% | 1.87% |
| MNSTMonster Beverage Corp. | 0.10% | 1.84% | 1.74% |
59.5% of KXI is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or KXI?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while KXI charges 0.38%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or KXI?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +5.09% for KXI, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IVV annualized +9.56% vs +5.68% for KXI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or KXI?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 12.7% for KXI. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs KXI -43.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and KXI?
IVV and KXI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and KXI?
59.5% of KXI's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 59.5% of KXI's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 35 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 94 in KXI.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or KXI?
IVV yields 1.06% while KXI yields 2.35%, so KXI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is KXI better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.