IVV vs KXI
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | KXI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.38% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $1.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 2.30% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 112 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | +7.47% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | +4.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | +7.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | +4.41% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 12.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -43.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 12, 2006 |
IVV vs KXI Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF (KXI) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% while KXI returned +4.19%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a gain of 7.47% for KXI.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.81% per year against +7.54% for KXI; over five years the annualized figures are +13.05% and +4.41% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs +5.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.7% for KXI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -43.9% for KXI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while KXI charges 0.38%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $38 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 2.30% for KXI.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and KXI share 35 holdings out of 564 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or KXI?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while KXI charges 0.38%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $35 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or KXI?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% vs +4.19% for KXI, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs +5.82% for KXI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or KXI?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.7% for KXI. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs KXI -43.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and KXI?
IVV and KXI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and KXI?
IVV and KXI share 35 common holdings with a 4.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 564 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or KXI?
IVV yields 1.10% while KXI yields 2.30%, so KXI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.