IVV vs LDRX
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs SGI Enhanced Market Leaders ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. LDRX delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | LDRX | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.59% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $241M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 1.11% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 105 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.01% | +24.29% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.77% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.39% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 14.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -10.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Summit Global Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 5, 2025 |
IVV vs LDRX Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and SGI Enhanced Market Leaders ETF (LDRX) is a ETF from Summit Global Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% while LDRX returned +24.29%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 12.68% for LDRX.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.5% for LDRX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -10.6% for LDRX. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while LDRX charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $59 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.11% for LDRX.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and LDRX share 99 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 67.6% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or LDRX?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while LDRX charges 0.59%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or LDRX?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% vs +24.29% for LDRX, so LDRX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +30.19% for LDRX. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or LDRX?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.5% for LDRX. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs LDRX -10.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and LDRX?
IVV and LDRX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and LDRX?
IVV and LDRX share 99 common holdings with a 67.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or LDRX?
IVV yields 1.09% while LDRX yields 1.11%, so LDRX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.