IVV vs LRGC
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | LRGC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.39% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $1.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.53% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 74 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | +10.43% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | +16.93% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | +21.31% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 12.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -19.4% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | AllianceBernstein L.P. | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 20, 2023 |
IVV vs LRGC Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) is a ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P.. Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% while LRGC returned +16.93%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a gain of 10.43% for LRGC.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.81% per year against +21.31% for LRGC. Across the full 3-year window we track, LRGC has the edge at +21.31% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.8% for LRGC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -19.4% for LRGC. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while LRGC charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $39 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.53% for LRGC.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and LRGC share 60 holdings out of 516 unique holdings combined, representing a 45.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or LRGC?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while LRGC charges 0.39%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or LRGC?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% vs +16.93% for LRGC, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs +21.31% for LRGC. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or LRGC?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.8% for LRGC. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs LRGC -19.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and LRGC?
IVV and LRGC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and LRGC?
IVV and LRGC share 60 common holdings with a 45.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 516 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or LRGC?
IVV yields 1.10% while LRGC yields 0.53%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.