IVV vs LSGR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | LSGR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.59% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $817M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 23 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | +2.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | +5.77% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | +20.91% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 18.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -22.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Natixis Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 29, 2023 |
IVV vs LSGR Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR) is a ETF from Natixis Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while LSGR returned +5.77%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a gain of 2.27% for LSGR.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.80% per year against +20.91% for LSGR. Across the full 3-year window we track, LSGR has the edge at +21.17% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LSGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -22.9% for LSGR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while LSGR charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $59 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for LSGR.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and LSGR share 20 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 26.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or LSGR?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while LSGR charges 0.59%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or LSGR?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs +5.77% for LSGR, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs +21.17% for LSGR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or LSGR?
LSGR has been the more volatile fund at 18.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs LSGR -22.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and LSGR?
IVV and LSGR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and LSGR?
IVV and LSGR share 20 common holdings with a 26.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or LSGR?
IVV yields 1.09% while LSGR yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.