LSGR vs VXUS
Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LSGR | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $817M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 23 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +2.27% | +15.24% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.77% | +26.32% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.91% | +19.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.9% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Natixis Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 29, 2023 | Jan 26, 2011 |
LSGR vs VXUS Performance
Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR) is a ETF from Natixis Funds and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LSGR returned +5.77% while VXUS returned +26.32%. Year to date, LSGR is up 2.27% versus a gain of 15.24% for VXUS.
Over three years, LSGR compounded at +20.91% per year against +19.85% for VXUS. Across the full 3-year window we track, LSGR has the edge at +21.17% annualized vs +4.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LSGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.2% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.9% for LSGR and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LSGR charges 0.59% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $5 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LSGR currently yields 0.00% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
LSGR and VXUS share 1 holdings out of 7881 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LSGR | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ORCL | 2.93% | 0.00% | 2.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LSGR or VXUS?
LSGR has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $54 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LSGR or VXUS?
Over the past year LSGR returned +5.77% vs +26.32% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), LSGR annualized +21.17% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LSGR or VXUS?
LSGR has been the more volatile fund at 18.2% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: LSGR -22.9% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both LSGR and VXUS?
LSGR and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LSGR and VXUS?
LSGR and VXUS share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7881 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LSGR or VXUS?
LSGR yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.