IVV vs PFDE
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Pathfinder Disciplined US Equity ETF
Which is better, IVV or PFDE?
IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PFDE |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.59% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $164M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.18% |
| Holdings | 508 | 86 |
| YTD Return | +12.39% | +13.61%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.61% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.51% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 43.6% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Pathfinder ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 31, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVV vs PFDE growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs PFDE Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Pathfinder Disciplined US Equity ETF (PFDE) is an ETF from Pathfinder ETFs. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 13.61% for PFDE.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PFDE charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $59 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.18% for PFDE.
Holdings Overlap
55.6% of IVV's money is in holdings PFDE also owns. 99.6% of PFDE's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of PFDE is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
87 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 88 in PFDE, against full books of 508 and 86.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 490 and 88 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 395 positions PFDE does not, 43.0% of the fund.
Largest: META 1.90%, BRK.B 1.39%, XOM 1.01%, V 0.95%, WMT 0.69%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in PFDE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.07% | 10.18% | 2.11% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.02% | 6.25% | 0.77% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.69% | 5.04% | 0.65% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.84% | 5.31% | 1.47% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.65% | 3.54% | 0.89% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.00% | 3.00% | 0.00% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.63% | 3.13% | 1.50% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.39% | 2.25% | 0.14% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.97% | 2.36% | 1.39% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 0.72% | 2.50% | 1.78% |
99.6% of PFDE is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PFDE?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PFDE charges 0.59%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PFDE?
99.6% of PFDE's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 99.6% of PFDE's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 87 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 88 in PFDE.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PFDE?
IVV yields 1.06% while PFDE yields 0.18%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PFDE better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.