IVV vs PJUS

IVV vs PJUS

Which is better, IVV or PJUS?

IVV costs less.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.0%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVPJUS
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.19%
AUM$876.4B$7M
Dividend Yield1.06%0.00%
Holdings50897
YTD Return+12.39%Best+4.62%
1Y Return+16.61%-
3Y Return (annualized)+21.38%-
5Y Return (annualized)+13.51%-
Top 10 Weight37.8%Best42.0%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)PGIM Investments
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMay 15, 2000May 20, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

IVV vs PJUS growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IVV vs PJUS Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and PGIM Jennison U.S. Core Equity ETF (PJUS) is an ETF from PGIM Investments. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 4.62% for PJUS.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while PJUS charges 0.19%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $19 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for PJUS.

Holdings Overlap

IVV already in PJUS58.6%
PJUS already in IVV88.7%

58.6% of IVV's money is in holdings PJUS also owns. 88.7% of PJUS's money is in holdings IVV also owns.

Most of PJUS is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

76 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 97 in PJUS, against full books of 508 and 97.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 20 positions for PJUS that do not appear in our book for IVV (10.5% of the fund), and 406 for IVV that do not appear in PJUS (40.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in PJUSDifference
NVDANvidia Corp8.07%7.38%0.69%
AAPLApple, Inc7.02%7.52%0.50%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.69%5.20%0.49%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A3.00%6.82%3.82%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.84%3.97%0.13%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.65%3.08%0.43%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1.63%2.26%0.63%
METAMeta Platforms Inc1.90%1.76%0.14%
JPMJpmorgan Chase1.44%1.84%0.40%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.1.38%1.80%0.42%

88.7% of PJUS is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

IVVPJUS

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or PJUS?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PJUS charges 0.19%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PJUS?

88.7% of PJUS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 88.7% of PJUS's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 76 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 97 in PJUS.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PJUS?

IVV yields 1.06% while PJUS yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is PJUS better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.