IVV vs QFLR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QFLR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.89% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $530M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 52 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +2.66% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +12.58% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 10.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -14.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Innovator ETFs Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 22, 2024 |
IVV vs QFLR Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while QFLR returned +12.58%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 2.66% for QFLR.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 10.4% for QFLR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -14.0% for QFLR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QFLR charges 0.89%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $89 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.00% for QFLR.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and QFLR share 34 holdings out of 510 unique holdings combined, representing a 44.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QFLR?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QFLR charges 0.89%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $86 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or QFLR?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +12.58% for QFLR, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +14.09% for QFLR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or QFLR?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 10.4% for QFLR. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs QFLR -14.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and QFLR?
IVV and QFLR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QFLR?
IVV and QFLR share 34 common holdings with a 44.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 510 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QFLR?
IVV yields 1.10% while QFLR yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.