IVV vs QQMG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF
Which is better, IVV or QQMG?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. QQMG led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QQMG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.20% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $197M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.36% |
| Holdings | 508 | 91 |
| YTD Return | +11.03% | +16.29%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.62% | +22.00%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.81% | +25.87%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.61% | +15.18%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6%Best | 21.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -24.5%Best | -35.4% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,109 | $20,271Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 50.1% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 27, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 28, 2021 to Sep 16, 2026 (4.9 years).
IVV vs QQMG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.9 years both funds cover.
IVV vs QQMG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +15.62% while QQMG returned +22.00%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.03% versus a gain of 16.29% for QQMG.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.81% per year against +25.87% for QQMG; over five years the annualized figures are +12.61% and +15.18% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQMG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.3% compared with 15.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.5% for IVV and -35.4% for QQMG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QQMG charges 0.20%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $20 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.36% for QQMG.
Holdings Overlap
51.7% of IVV's money is in holdings QQMG also owns. 92.2% of QQMG's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of QQMG is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
76 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 89 in QQMG, against full books of 508 and 91.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 6 positions for QQMG that do not appear in our book for IVV (1.1% of the fund), and 406 for IVV that do not appear in QQMG (46.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in QQMG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.07% | 10.59% | 2.52% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.02% | 8.27% | 1.25% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.69% | 6.96% | 1.27% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.84% | 4.70% | 0.86% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.63% | 4.39% | 2.76% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.00% | 2.86% | 0.14% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.65% | 2.51% | 0.14% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.39% | 2.65% | 0.26% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.56% | 2.80% | 1.24% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.90% | 1.91% | 0.01% |
92.2% of QQMG is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QQMG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QQMG charges 0.20%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or QQMG?
Over the past year IVV returned +15.62% vs +22.00% for QQMG, so QQMG leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or QQMG?
QQMG has been the more volatile fund at 21.3% annualized versus 15.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -24.5% vs QQMG -35.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and QQMG?
IVV and QQMG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QQMG?
92.2% of QQMG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 92.2% of QQMG's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 76 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 89 in QQMG.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QQMG?
IVV yields 1.06% while QQMG yields 0.36%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQMG better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. QQMG led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.