IVV vs QSIX
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Pacer Metaurus Nasdaq-100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF
Which is better, IVV or QSIX?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. QSIX led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QSIX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.60% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $19M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 3.79% |
| Holdings | 508 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +12.51% | +15.24%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.57% | +20.79%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.27% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.95% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.6%Best | 16.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -19.5% |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $13,750 | $14,719Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 44.6% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Pacer ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 23, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 24, 2024 to Sep 11, 2026 (2 years).
IVV vs QSIX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
IVV vs QSIX Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Pacer Metaurus Nasdaq-100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while QSIX returned +20.79%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.51% versus a gain of 15.24% for QSIX.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QSIX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 12.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -19.5% for QSIX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QSIX charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $60 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 3.79% for QSIX.
Holdings Overlap
54.1% of IVV's money is in holdings QSIX also owns. 87.2% of QSIX's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of QSIX is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
87 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 103 in QSIX, against full books of 508 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 8 positions for QSIX that do not appear in our book for IVV (6.6% of the fund), and 408 for IVV that do not appear in QSIX (45.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in QSIX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.98% | 7.46% | 0.52% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.86% | 6.61% | 0.25% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 5.44% | 5.33% | 0.11% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.01% | 4.34% | 0.33% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 3.19% | 3.20% | 0.01% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.98% | 2.88% | 0.10% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.51% | 4.04% | 2.53% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.56% | 2.98% | 0.42% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. | 1.18% | 3.40% | 2.22% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 1.94% | 2.53% | 0.59% |
87.2% of QSIX is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QSIX?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QSIX charges 0.60%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or QSIX?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +20.79% for QSIX, so QSIX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +17.26% vs +21.32% for QSIX. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or QSIX?
QSIX has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 12.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs QSIX -19.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and QSIX?
IVV and QSIX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QSIX?
87.2% of QSIX's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 87.2% of QSIX's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 87 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 103 in QSIX.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QSIX?
IVV yields 1.06% while QSIX yields 3.79%, so QSIX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QSIX better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. QSIX led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.