QSIX vs SCHD
Pacer Metaurus Nasdaq-100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. QSIX offers more diversification with 107 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QSIX | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $19M | $112.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.78% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 107 | 103 | |
| YTD Return | +14.54% | +28.33% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.72% | +30.37% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.04% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.8% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.5% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 23, 2024 | Oct 20, 2011 |
QSIX vs SCHD Performance
Pacer Metaurus Nasdaq-100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year QSIX returned +23.72% while SCHD returned +30.37%. Year to date, QSIX is up 14.54% versus a gain of 28.33% for SCHD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QSIX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.8% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.5% for QSIX and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.09. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QSIX charges 0.60% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $6 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QSIX currently yields 3.78% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
QSIX and SCHD share 8 holdings out of 195 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QSIX or SCHD?
QSIX has an expense ratio of 0.60% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $54 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QSIX or SCHD?
Over the past year QSIX returned +23.72% vs +30.37% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QSIX annualized +21.24% vs +11.58% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QSIX or SCHD?
QSIX has been the more volatile fund at 16.8% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: QSIX -19.5% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both QSIX and SCHD?
QSIX and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.09, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QSIX and SCHD?
QSIX and SCHD share 8 common holdings with a 4.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 195 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QSIX or SCHD?
QSIX yields 3.78% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so QSIX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.