IVV vs RAUS
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs RACWI US ETF
Which is better, IVV or RAUS?
Large Cap Blend against All Cap Blend.
RAUS has a lower expense ratio. RAUS led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RAUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.00%Best |
| AUM | $876.4B | $60M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.22% |
| Holdings | 508 | 520 |
| YTD Return | +14.14% | +14.97%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.30% | +18.67%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.04% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.63% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2% | 12.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9% | -8.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $11,877 | $12,008Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 40.6% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | RAFI Indices |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | All Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 11, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 12, 2025 to Sep 22, 2026 (1 years).
IVV vs RAUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
IVV vs RAUS Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and RACWI US ETF (RAUS) is an ETF from RAFI Indices. Over the past year IVV returned +17.30% while RAUS returned +18.67%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.14% versus a gain of 14.97% for RAUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.2% compared with 12.8% for RAUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for IVV and -8.6% for RAUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 1.00. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RAUS charges 0.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $0 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.22% for RAUS.
Holdings Overlap
91.6% of IVV's money is in holdings RAUS also owns. 96.8% of RAUS's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of RAUS is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
394 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 515 in RAUS, against full books of 508 and 520.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 90 positions for RAUS that do not appear in our book for IVV (2.8% of the fund), and 90 for IVV that do not appear in RAUS (7.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in RAUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.07% | 8.24% | 0.17% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.02% | 7.37% | 0.35% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.69% | 5.80% | 0.11% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.00% | 5.52% | 2.52% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.84% | 3.88% | 0.04% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.65% | 2.68% | 0.03% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.90% | 2.04% | 0.14% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.56% | 1.85% | 0.29% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.63% | 1.68% | 0.05% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.44% | 1.49% | 0.05% |
96.8% of RAUS is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RAUS?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RAUS charges 0.00%. RAUS is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or RAUS?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.30% vs +18.67% for RAUS, so RAUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +18.77% vs +20.08% for RAUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or RAUS?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 13.2% annualized versus 12.8% for RAUS. Worst drawdown: IVV -8.9% vs RAUS -8.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and RAUS?
IVV and RAUS have a monthly-return correlation of 1.00, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RAUS?
96.8% of RAUS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 96.8% of RAUS's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 394 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 515 in RAUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RAUS?
IVV yields 1.06% while RAUS yields 0.22%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RAUS better than IVV?
RAUS has a lower expense ratio. RAUS led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.