IVV vs RCGE
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs RockCreek Global Equality ETF
Which is better, IVV or RCGE?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. RCGE is less concentrated, with 6.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RCGE |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.95% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $100M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.66% |
| Holdings | 508 | 208 |
| YTD Return | +12.39%Best | +5.42% |
| 1Y Return | +16.61%Best | +8.54% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.51% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.1% | 10.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.2% | -12.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $13,400Best | $12,485 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8% | 6.7%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | RockCreek |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 26, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 27, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.6 years).
IVV vs RCGE growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
IVV vs RCGE Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and RockCreek Global Equality ETF (RCGE) is an ETF from RockCreek. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while RCGE returned +8.54%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 5.42% for RCGE.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.1% compared with 10.3% for RCGE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.2% for IVV and -12.4% for RCGE. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RCGE charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $95 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.66% for RCGE.
Holdings Overlap
13.6% of IVV's money is in holdings RCGE also owns. 25.2% of RCGE's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
RCGE and IVV share little of their money.
50 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 202 in RCGE, against full books of 508 and 208.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 22 positions for RCGE that do not appear in our book for IVV (11.1% of the fund), and 432 for IVV that do not appear in RCGE (85.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in RCGE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.69% | 0.65% | 5.04% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 0.72% | 0.56% | 0.16% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.68% | 0.55% | 0.13% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 0.55% | 0.60% | 0.05% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 0.61% | 0.51% | 0.10% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 0.51% | 0.45% | 0.06% |
| TMOThermo Fisherscientific Inc. | 0.35% | 0.61% | 0.26% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 0.40% | 0.50% | 0.10% |
| GSGoldman Sachs Group Inc/The | 0.46% | 0.43% | 0.03% |
| VZVerizon Communic | 0.32% | 0.51% | 0.19% |
25.2% of RCGE is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RCGE?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RCGE charges 0.95%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or RCGE?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs +8.54% for RCGE, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +20.07% vs +14.88% for RCGE. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or RCGE?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 13.1% annualized versus 10.3% for RCGE. Worst drawdown: IVV -16.2% vs RCGE -12.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and RCGE?
IVV and RCGE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RCGE?
25.2% of RCGE's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 25.2% of RCGE's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 50 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 202 in RCGE.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RCGE?
IVV yields 1.06% while RCGE yields 1.66%, so RCGE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RCGE better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. RCGE is less concentrated, with 6.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.