IVV vs RVRB
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Reverb ETF
Which is better, IVV or RVRB?
Nearly the same fund. IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RVRB |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.30% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $5M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.86% |
| Holdings | 508 | 499 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8%Best | 12.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -19.1% |
| $10,000 over 3.4 years | $18,050Best | $17,218 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 38.2% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Reverb ETF |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 3, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 168 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. IVV has data through Sep 10, 2026 and RVRB through Mar 26, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 4, 2022 to Mar 26, 2026 (3.4 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RVRB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.9% compared with 12.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -19.1% for RVRB. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 1.00. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RVRB charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $30 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.86% for RVRB.
Holdings Overlap
94.1% of IVV's money is in holdings RVRB also owns. 94.0% of RVRB's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of IVV is already inside RVRB. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 217 days apart, IVV as of Aug 5, 2026 and RVRB as of Dec 31, 2025, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
405 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 493 in RVRB, against full books of 508 and 499.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 41 positions for RVRB that do not appear in our book for IVV (2.3% of the fund), and 97 for IVV that do not appear in RVRB (5.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in RVRB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.98% | 6.78% | 1.20% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.86% | 5.40% | 1.46% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 5.44% | 5.92% | 0.48% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 3.19% | 6.28% | 3.09% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.01% | 4.24% | 0.23% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.98% | 2.52% | 0.46% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 1.94% | 2.13% | 0.19% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.36% | 1.93% | 0.57% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway B | 1.43% | 1.55% | 0.12% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.39% | 1.42% | 0.03% |
94.1% of IVV is already inside RVRB.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RVRB?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RVRB charges 0.30%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, IVV or RVRB?
RVRB has been the more volatile fund at 12.9% annualized versus 12.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs RVRB -19.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and RVRB?
IVV and RVRB have a monthly-return correlation of 1.00, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RVRB?
94.1% of IVV's money is in holdings RVRB also owns. 94.0% of RVRB's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 405 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 493 in RVRB.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RVRB?
IVV yields 1.06% while RVRB yields 0.86%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RVRB better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.