IVV vs RXL
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs ProShares Ultra Health Care
Which is better, IVV or RXL?
Large Cap Blend against Multi Alternative.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y and 5Y, RXL over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RXL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.95% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $97M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.29% |
| Holdings | 508 | 67 |
| YTD Return | +12.27% | +13.16%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.04% | +44.65%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.24%Best | +12.00% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.08%Best | +3.35% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.5%Best | 29.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5%Best | -69.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,490Best | $11,791 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | ProShares |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 30, 2007 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 1, 2007 to Sep 17, 2026 (19.6 years).
IVV vs RXL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.6 years both funds cover.
IVV vs RXL Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) is an ETF from ProShares. Over the past year IVV returned +17.04% while RXL returned +44.65%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.27% versus a gain of 13.16% for RXL.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.24% per year against +12.00% for RXL; over five years the annualized figures are +13.08% and +3.35% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, RXL has the edge at +14.27% annualized vs +9.28%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RXL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.4% compared with 15.5% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -69.0% for RXL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RXL charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $95 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.29% for RXL.
Holdings Overlap
At least 9.0% of IVV's money is in holdings RXL also owns.
Stated as a floor: for RXL, our book for it covers 76.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
IVV and RXL share little of their money.
55 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 60 in RXL, against full books of 508 and 67.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in RXL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.38% | 10.11% | 8.73% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.97% | 7.07% | 6.10% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.68% | 5.01% | 4.33% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 0.55% | 4.03% | 3.48% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 0.53% | 3.91% | 3.38% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 0.35% | 2.56% | 2.21% |
| TMOThermo Fisherscientific Inc. | 0.35% | 2.53% | 2.18% |
| ABTAbbott Laboratories | 0.29% | 2.12% | 1.83% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 0.27% | 2.01% | 1.74% |
| PFEPfizer Inc | 0.24% | 1.79% | 1.55% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and RXL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RXL?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RXL charges 0.95%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or RXL?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.04% vs +44.65% for RXL, so RXL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IVV annualized +9.28% vs +14.27% for RXL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or RXL?
RXL has been the more volatile fund at 29.4% annualized versus 15.5% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs RXL -69.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and RXL?
IVV and RXL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RXL?
At least 9.0% of IVV's money is in holdings RXL also owns. Our book for RXL is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 55 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 60 in RXL.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RXL?
IVV yields 1.06% while RXL yields 1.29%, so RXL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RXL better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y and 5Y, RXL over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.