IVV vs SNPD
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Xtrackers S&P Dividend Aristocrats Screened ETF
Which is better, IVV or SNPD?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. SNPD is less concentrated, with 24.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SNPD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.15% |
| AUM | $882.6B | $3M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 3.14% |
| Holdings | 508 | 214 |
| YTD Return | +14.82%Best | +6.47% |
| 1Y Return | +18.68%Best | +8.17% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.30%Best | +9.11% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.99% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8%Best | 13.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8% | -15.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.9 years | $21,912Best | $12,625 |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.1% | 24.7%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Xtrackers ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 9, 2022 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 9, 2022 to Oct 9, 2026 (3.9 years).
IVV vs SNPD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.
IVV vs SNPD Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Xtrackers S&P Dividend Aristocrats Screened ETF (SNPD) is an ETF from Xtrackers ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +18.68% while SNPD returned +8.17%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.82% versus a gain of 6.47% for SNPD.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +23.30% per year against +9.11% for SNPD. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +22.28% annualized vs +6.16%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SNPD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.2% compared with 12.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -15.8% for SNPD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SNPD charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $15 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 3.14% for SNPD.
Holdings Overlap
16.7% of IVV's money is in holdings SNPD also owns. 73.6% of SNPD's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of SNPD is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
76 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 106 in SNPD, against full books of 508 and 214.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 30 positions for SNPD that do not appear in our book for IVV (26.0% of the fund), and 422 for IVV that do not appear in SNPD (82.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in SNPD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.57% | 0.29% | 5.28% |
| VZVerizon Communications Inc Vz | 0.32% | 3.56% | 3.24% |
| BBYBest Buy Co Inc | 0.03% | 2.89% | 2.86% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.04% | 1.80% | 0.76% |
| TGTTARGET CORP | 0.11% | 2.36% | 2.25% |
| BENFranklin Resources Inc. | 0.02% | 2.34% | 2.32% |
| AMCRAmcor Ltd. | 0.03% | 2.24% | 2.21% |
| EIXEdison Intl | 0.03% | 2.12% | 2.09% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.69% | 1.45% | 0.76% |
| ORealty Income Corp. | 0.08% | 1.95% | 1.87% |
73.6% of SNPD is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SNPD?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SNPD charges 0.15%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or SNPD?
Over the past year IVV returned +18.68% vs +8.17% for SNPD, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +22.28% vs +6.16% for SNPD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or SNPD?
SNPD has been the more volatile fund at 13.2% annualized versus 12.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs SNPD -15.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and SNPD?
IVV and SNPD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SNPD?
73.6% of SNPD's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 73.6% of SNPD's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 76 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 106 in SNPD.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SNPD?
IVV yields 1.06% while SNPD yields 3.14%, so SNPD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SNPD better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. SNPD is less concentrated, with 24.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.