SNPD vs VYM
Xtrackers S&P Dividend Aristocrats Screened ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, SNPD or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. SNPD is less concentrated, with 24.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SNPD | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $3M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.14% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 107 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +7.99% | +11.47%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.58% | +15.94%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.93% | +18.03%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.35% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.1% | 11.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -15.8% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.9 years | $12,845 | $16,784Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 24.8%Best | 26.1% |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 9, 2022 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 9, 2022 to Sep 21, 2026 (3.9 years).
SNPD vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.
SNPD vs VYM Performance
Xtrackers S&P Dividend Aristocrats Screened ETF (SNPD) is an ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SNPD returned +9.58% while VYM returned +15.94%. Year to date, SNPD is up 7.99% versus a gain of 11.47% for VYM.
Over three years, SNPD compounded at +8.93% per year against +18.03% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +14.20% annualized vs +6.63%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SNPD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.1% compared with 11.5% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.8% for SNPD and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SNPD charges 0.15% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $4 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SNPD currently yields 3.14% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
78.8% of SNPD's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 22.8% of VYM's money is in holdings SNPD also owns.
Most of SNPD is already inside VYM. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
69 positions in common, counted across the 106 positions we hold weights for in SNPD and 557 in VYM, against full books of 107 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 459 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for SNPD (74.3% of the fund), and 36 for SNPD that do not appear in VYM (20.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SNPD | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.74% | 2.63% | 0.89% |
| VZVerizon Communic | 3.41% | 0.80% | 2.61% |
| RHIRobert Half International Inc. | 3.64% | 0.02% | 3.62% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 1.41% | 1.80% | 0.39% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 1.32% | 1.38% | 0.06% |
| BBYBest Buy Co. Inc. | 2.60% | 0.07% | 2.53% |
| TGTTarget Corp Common Stock Usd.0833 | 2.38% | 0.27% | 2.11% |
| AMCRAmcor Ltd. | 2.42% | 0.08% | 2.34% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 1.10% | 1.37% | 0.27% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 1.30% | 1.02% | 0.28% |
78.8% of SNPD is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SNPD or VYM?
SNPD has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SNPD or VYM?
Over the past year SNPD returned +9.58% vs +15.94% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SNPD annualized +6.63% vs +14.20% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SNPD or VYM?
SNPD has been the more volatile fund at 13.1% annualized versus 11.5% for VYM. Worst drawdown: SNPD -15.8% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both SNPD and VYM?
SNPD and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SNPD and VYM?
78.8% of SNPD's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 22.8% of VYM's is in holdings SNPD also owns. They hold 69 positions in common, counted across the 106 positions we hold weights for in SNPD and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, SNPD or VYM?
SNPD yields 3.14% while VYM yields 2.22%, so SNPD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than SNPD?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. SNPD is less concentrated, with 24.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.