IVV vs SNPG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth Scored & Screened ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SNPG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.15% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $13M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.45% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 87 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +12.94% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.01% | +22.13% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.77% | +24.07% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.39% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 16.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -21.7% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Xtrackers ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 9, 2022 |
IVV vs SNPG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth Scored & Screened ETF (SNPG) is a ETF from Xtrackers ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% while SNPG returned +22.13%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 12.94% for SNPG.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.77% per year against +24.07% for SNPG. Across the full 4-year window we track, SNPG has the edge at +27.81% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SNPG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -21.7% for SNPG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SNPG charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $15 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.45% for SNPG.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SNPG share 81 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 36.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SNPG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SNPG charges 0.15%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SNPG?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% vs +22.13% for SNPG, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +27.81% for SNPG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SNPG?
SNPG has been the more volatile fund at 16.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SNPG -21.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and SNPG?
IVV and SNPG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SNPG?
IVV and SNPG share 81 common holdings with a 36.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SNPG?
IVV yields 1.09% while SNPG yields 0.45%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.