IVV vs SNPG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth Scored & Screened ETF
Which is better, IVV or SNPG?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, SNPG over 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SNPG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.15% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $14M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.47% |
| Holdings | 508 | 87 |
| YTD Return | +12.39%Best | +10.00% |
| 1Y Return | +16.61%Best | +13.56% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38% | +22.34%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.51% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.0%Best | 15.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -21.7% |
| $10,000 over 3.9 years | $21,682 | $24,690Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 55.3% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Xtrackers ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 9, 2022 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 9, 2022 to Sep 18, 2026 (3.9 years).
IVV vs SNPG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.
IVV vs SNPG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth Scored & Screened ETF (SNPG) is an ETF from Xtrackers ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while SNPG returned +13.56%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 10.00% for SNPG.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.38% per year against +22.34% for SNPG. Across the full 4-year window we track, SNPG has the edge at +26.08% annualized vs +21.95%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SNPG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 13.0% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -21.7% for SNPG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SNPG charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $15 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.47% for SNPG.
Holdings Overlap
37.3% of IVV's money is in holdings SNPG also owns. 98.5% of SNPG's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of SNPG is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
80 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 84 in SNPG, against full books of 508 and 87.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 3 positions for SNPG that do not appear in our book for IVV (0.8% of the fund), and 402 for IVV that do not appear in SNPG (61.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in SNPG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.07% | 9.31% | 1.24% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.69% | 11.19% | 5.50% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.63% | 8.27% | 6.64% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.38% | 7.05% | 5.67% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.00% | 4.78% | 1.78% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.39% | 3.83% | 1.44% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 0.95% | 2.65% | 1.70% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 0.55% | 2.79% | 2.24% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 0.57% | 2.76% | 2.19% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 0.55% | 2.67% | 2.12% |
98.5% of SNPG is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SNPG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SNPG charges 0.15%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or SNPG?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs +13.56% for SNPG, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +21.95% vs +26.08% for SNPG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or SNPG?
SNPG has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 13.0% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs SNPG -21.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and SNPG?
IVV and SNPG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SNPG?
98.5% of SNPG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 98.5% of SNPG's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 80 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 84 in SNPG.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SNPG?
IVV yields 1.06% while SNPG yields 0.47%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SNPG better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, SNPG over 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.